From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux-Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:22:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110428102244.6e1113e9@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303920491-25302-13-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:08:10 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> +/*
> + * Throttle direct reclaimers if backing storage is backed by the network
> + * and the PFMEMALLOC reserve for the preferred node is getting dangerously
> + * depleted. kswapd will continue to make progress and wake the processes
> + * when the low watermark is reached
> + */
> +static void throttle_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, struct zonelist *zonelist,
> + nodemask_t *nodemask)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask);
> + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> + /* Check if the pfmemalloc reserves are ok */
> + first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, high_zoneidx, NULL, &zone);
> + if (pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(zone->zone_pgdat, high_zoneidx))
> + return;
As the first thing that 'wait_event_interruptible" does is test the condition
and return if it is true, this "if () return;" is pointless.
> +
> + /* Throttle */
> + wait_event_interruptible(zone->zone_pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait,
> + pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(zone->zone_pgdat, high_zoneidx));
> +}
I was surprised that you chose wait_event_interruptible as your previous code
was almost exactly "wait_event_killable".
Is there some justification for not throttling processes which happen to have
a (non-fatal) signal pending?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
> +
> unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
> gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> {
> @@ -2133,6 +2172,15 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
> .nodemask = nodemask,
> };
>
> + throttle_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, zonelist, nodemask);
> +
> + /*
> + * Do not enter reclaim if fatal signal is pending. 1 is returned so
> + * that the page allocator does not consider triggering OOM
> + */
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + return 1;
> +
> trace_mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin(order,
> sc.may_writepage,
> gfp_mask);
> @@ -2488,6 +2536,12 @@ loop_again:
> }
>
> }
> +
> + /* Wake throttled direct reclaimers if low watermark is met */
> + if (waitqueue_active(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait) &&
> + pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pgdat, MAX_NR_ZONES - 1))
> + wake_up_interruptible(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait);
> +
> if (all_zones_ok || (order && pgdat_balanced(pgdat, balanced, *classzone_idx)))
> break; /* kswapd: all done */
> /*
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 16:07 [PATCH 00/13] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v3 Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:07 ` [PATCH 01/13] mm: Serialize access to min_free_kbytes Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 02/13] mm: sl[au]b: Add knowledge of PFMEMALLOC reserve pages Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 03/13] mm: Introduce __GFP_MEMALLOC to allow access to emergency reserves Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 04/13] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 05/13] mm: Ignore mempolicies when using ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 06/13] net: Introduce sk_allocation() to allow addition of GFP flags depending on the individual socket Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 07/13] netvm: Allow the use of __GFP_MEMALLOC by specific sockets Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 08/13] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves Mel Gorman
2011-04-28 6:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-28 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-28 10:47 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-28 11:18 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-29 2:55 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-03 11:45 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 09/13] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 10/13] mm: Micro-optimise slab to avoid a function call Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 11/13] nbd: Set SOCK_MEMALLOC for access to PFMEMALLOC reserves Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 12/13] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage Mel Gorman
2011-04-28 0:22 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-04-28 10:14 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 13/13] mm: Account for the number of times direct reclaimers get throttled Mel Gorman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-26 7:36 [PATCH 00/13] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking Mel Gorman
2011-04-26 7:36 ` [PATCH 12/13] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage Mel Gorman
2011-04-26 12:30 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-26 14:26 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-26 23:18 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-27 8:36 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110428102244.6e1113e9@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).