From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 7/10] workqueue: add WQ_IDLEPRI
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:38:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110526093808.GE9715@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110526143024.7f66e797.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hello, KAMEZAWA.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:30:24PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> When this idea came to me, I wonder which is better to maintain
> memcg's thread pool or add support in workqueue for generic use. In
> genral, I feel enhancing genric one is better...so, wrote this one.
Sure, if it's something which can be useful for other users, it makes
sense to make it generic.
> Index: memcg_async/include/linux/workqueue.h
> ===================================================================
> --- memcg_async.orig/include/linux/workqueue.h
> +++ memcg_async/include/linux/workqueue.h
> @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ enum {
>
> /* special cpu IDs */
> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND = NR_CPUS,
> - WORK_CPU_NONE = NR_CPUS + 1,
> + WORK_CPU_IDLEPRI = NR_CPUS + 1,
> + WORK_CPU_NONE = NR_CPUS + 2,
> WORK_CPU_LAST = WORK_CPU_NONE,
Hmmm... so, you're defining another fake CPU a la unbound CPU. I'm
not sure whether it's really necessary to create its own worker pool
tho. The reason why SCHED_OTHER is necessary is because it may
consume large amount of CPU cycles. Workqueue already has UNBOUND -
for an unbound one, workqueue code simply acts as generic worker pool
provider and everything other than work item dispatching and worker
management are deferred to scheduler and the workqueue user.
Is there any reason memcg can't just use UNBOUND workqueue and set
scheduling priority when the work item starts and restore it when it's
done? If it's gonna be using UNBOUND at all, I don't think changing
scheduling policy would be a noticeable overhead and I find having
separate worker pools depending on scheduling priority somewhat silly.
We can add a mechanism to manage work item scheduler priority to
workqueue if necessary tho, I think. But that would be per-workqueue
attribute which is applied during execution, not something per-gcwq.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-26 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-26 5:10 [RFC][PATCH v3 0/10] memcg async reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 5:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 1/10] check reclaimable in hierarchy walk KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 5:47 ` Ying Han
2011-05-26 5:18 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 2/10] memcg: fix cached charge drain ratio KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 5:19 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 3/10] memcg: a test whether zone is reclaimable or not KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 7:21 ` Ying Han
2011-05-27 8:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 5:20 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 4/10] memcg: export swappiness KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 5:23 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 5/10] memcg keep margin to limit in background KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 5:24 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 6/10] memcg : auto keep margin in background , workqueue core KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 5:30 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 7/10] workqueue: add WQ_IDLEPRI KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 9:38 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-05-26 10:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 10:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 11:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-26 23:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 5:32 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 8/10] memcg: scan ratio calculation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 5:35 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 9/10] memcg: scan limited memory reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 5:36 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 10/10] memcg : reclaim statistics KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 1:13 ` Ying Han
2011-05-27 1:17 ` Ying Han
2011-05-27 1:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 1:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 1:22 ` Ying Han
2011-05-27 1:49 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 0/10] memcg async reclaim Ying Han
2011-05-27 2:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 4:33 ` Ying Han
2011-05-27 4:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 4:49 ` Ying Han
2011-05-27 7:20 ` Ying Han
2011-05-31 17:04 ` Ying Han
2011-05-27 2:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 3:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 4:34 ` Ying Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110526093808.GE9715@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).