From: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@start.ca>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 4/22] 4: Uprobes: register/unregister probes.
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:10:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110608221032.GA9965@wicker.gateway.2wire.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110607125900.28590.16071.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6>
Hi Srikar,
Just a few questions/comments inline below.
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:29:00PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> +int register_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> + struct uprobe_consumer *consumer)
> +{
> + struct prio_tree_iter iter;
> + struct list_head try_list, success_list;
> + struct address_space *mapping;
> + struct mm_struct *mm, *tmpmm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct uprobe *uprobe;
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + if (!inode || !consumer || consumer->next)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (offset > inode->i_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + uprobe = alloc_uprobe(inode, offset);
> + if (!uprobe)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&try_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&success_list);
> + mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&uprobes_mutex);
> + if (uprobe->consumers) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto consumers_add;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> + vma_prio_tree_foreach(vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, 0, 0) {
> + loff_t vaddr;
> + struct task_struct *tsk;
> +
> + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users))
> + continue;
> +
> + mm = vma->vm_mm;
> + if (!valid_vma(vma)) {
> + mmput(mm);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + vaddr = vma->vm_start + offset;
> + vaddr -= vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + if (vaddr < vma->vm_start || vaddr > vma->vm_end) {
This check looks like it is off by one? vma->vm_end is already one byte
past the last valid address in the vma, so we should compare using ">="
here I think.
> + /* Not in this vma */
> + mmput(mm);
> + continue;
> + }
> + tsk = get_mm_owner(mm);
> + if (tsk && vaddr > TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)) {
> + /*
> + * We cannot have a virtual address that is
> + * greater than TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)
> + */
> + put_task_struct(tsk);
> + mmput(mm);
> + continue;
> + }
> + put_task_struct(tsk);
> + mm->uprobes_vaddr = (unsigned long) vaddr;
> + list_add(&mm->uprobes_list, &try_list);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> +
> + if (list_empty(&try_list)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto consumers_add;
> + }
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(mm, tmpmm, &try_list, uprobes_list) {
> + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + ret = install_breakpoint(mm, uprobe);
> +
> + if (ret && (ret != -ESRCH || ret != -EEXIST)) {
> + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + break;
> + }
> + if (!ret)
> + list_move(&mm->uprobes_list, &success_list);
> + else {
> + /*
> + * install_breakpoint failed as there are no active
> + * threads for the mm; ignore the error.
> + */
> + list_del(&mm->uprobes_list);
> + mmput(mm);
> + }
> + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + }
> +
> + if (list_empty(&try_list)) {
> + /*
> + * All install_breakpoints were successful;
> + * cleanup successful entries.
> + */
> + ret = 0;
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(mm, tmpmm, &success_list,
> + uprobes_list) {
> + list_del(&mm->uprobes_list);
> + mmput(mm);
> + }
> + goto consumers_add;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Atleast one unsuccessful install_breakpoint;
> + * remove successful probes and cleanup untried entries.
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(mm, tmpmm, &success_list, uprobes_list)
> + remove_breakpoint(mm, uprobe);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(mm, tmpmm, &try_list, uprobes_list) {
> + list_del(&mm->uprobes_list);
> + mmput(mm);
> + }
> + delete_uprobe(uprobe);
> + goto put_unlock;
> +
> +consumers_add:
> + add_consumer(uprobe, consumer);
> +
> +put_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&uprobes_mutex);
> + put_uprobe(uprobe); /* drop access ref */
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * unregister_uprobe - unregister a already registered probe.
> + * @inode: the file in which the probe has to be removed.
> + * @offset: offset from the start of the file.
> + * @consumer: identify which probe if multiple probes are colocated.
> + */
> +void unregister_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> + struct uprobe_consumer *consumer)
> +{
> + struct prio_tree_iter iter;
> + struct list_head tmp_list;
> + struct address_space *mapping;
> + struct mm_struct *mm, *tmpmm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct uprobe *uprobe;
> +
> + if (!inode || !consumer)
> + return;
> +
> + uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
> + if (!uprobe) {
> + pr_debug("No uprobe found with inode:offset %p %lld\n",
> + inode, offset);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!del_consumer(uprobe, consumer)) {
> + pr_debug("No uprobe found with consumer %p\n",
> + consumer);
> + return;
> + }
When del_consumer() fails dont we still need to do a put_uprobe(uprobe)
to drop the extra access ref?
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp_list);
> +
> + mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&uprobes_mutex);
> + if (uprobe->consumers)
> + goto put_unlock;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> + vma_prio_tree_foreach(vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, 0, 0) {
> + struct task_struct *tsk;
> +
> + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users))
> + continue;
> +
> + mm = vma->vm_mm;
> +
> + if (!atomic_read(&mm->uprobes_count)) {
> + mmput(mm);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (valid_vma(vma)) {
> + loff_t vaddr;
> +
> + vaddr = vma->vm_start + offset;
> + vaddr -= vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + if (vaddr < vma->vm_start || vaddr > vma->vm_end) {
Same issue with the comparison against vma->vm_end here as well.
Thanks,
> + /* Not in this vma */
> + mmput(mm);
> + continue;
> + }
> + tsk = get_mm_owner(mm);
> + if (tsk && vaddr > TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)) {
> + /*
> + * We cannot have a virtual address that is
> + * greater than TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)
> + */
> + put_task_struct(tsk);
> + mmput(mm);
> + continue;
> + }
> + put_task_struct(tsk);
> + mm->uprobes_vaddr = (unsigned long) vaddr;
> + list_add(&mm->uprobes_list, &tmp_list);
> + } else
> + mmput(mm);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(mm, tmpmm, &tmp_list, uprobes_list)
> + remove_breakpoint(mm, uprobe);
> +
> + delete_uprobe(uprobe);
> +
> +put_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&uprobes_mutex);
> + put_uprobe(uprobe); /* drop access ref */
> +}
--
steve
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-07 12:58 [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 0/22] 0: Uprobes patchset with perf probe support Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 1/22] 1: X86 specific breakpoint definitions Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 2/22] 2: uprobes: Breakground page replacement Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-09 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-13 8:48 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-09 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-13 8:50 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-09 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-13 8:59 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-14 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-14 14:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-09 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-13 9:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-13 13:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-13 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-14 12:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-14 14:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-15 8:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-15 17:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-14 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-14 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-14 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-14 15:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-14 18:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-07 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 3/22] 3: uprobes: Adding and remove a uprobe in a rb tree Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-08 4:12 ` Stephen Wilson
2011-06-08 7:04 ` Josh Stone
2011-06-08 10:29 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-08 10:30 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 4/22] 4: Uprobes: register/unregister probes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-08 22:10 ` Stephen Wilson [this message]
2011-06-09 5:43 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-09 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 5:40 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-09 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-13 16:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-16 5:26 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-16 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-13 19:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-14 12:00 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-14 14:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-15 17:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-16 5:09 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-15 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 4:11 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-16 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 9:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-16 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 13:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-17 9:29 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-15 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-24 18:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-07-25 12:17 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 5/22] 5: x86: analyze instruction and determine fixups Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-09 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 6/22] 6: uprobes: store/restore original instruction Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 7/22] 7: uprobes: mmap and fork hooks Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-08 22:12 ` Stephen Wilson
2011-06-09 5:50 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-15 18:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 3:26 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-16 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 13:00 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-16 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 18:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-17 4:50 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-17 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-17 9:05 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-17 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-21 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-22 14:39 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-24 2:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-24 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-27 6:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-27 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-18 9:20 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-07-18 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-19 6:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-07-20 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 8/22] 8: x86: architecture specific task information Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 9/22] 9: uprobes: task specific information Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:00 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 10/22] 10: uprobes: slot allocation for uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:00 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 11/22] 11: uprobes: get the breakpoint address Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:00 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 12/22] 12: x86: x86 specific probe handling Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:00 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 13/22] 13: uprobes: Handing int3 and singlestep exception Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-08 22:11 ` Stephen Wilson
2011-06-09 5:47 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-16 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 12:04 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-16 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-07 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 14/22] 14: x86: uprobes exception notifier for x86 Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-21 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-21 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-22 14:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-22 16:40 ` Roland McGrath
2011-06-07 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 15/22] 15: uprobes: register a notifier for uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 16/22] 16: tracing: Extract out common code for kprobes/uprobes traceevents Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 17/22] 17: tracing: uprobes trace_event interface Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 18/22] 18: tracing: Uprobe tracer documentation Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 19/22] 19: perf: rename target_module to target Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 20/22] 20: perf: perf interface for uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-07 13:38 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2011-06-07 14:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-06-07 16:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-08 3:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-06-07 19:59 ` Josh Stone
2011-06-08 3:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-10 11:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-06-07 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 21/22] 21: perf: show possible probes in a given executable file or library Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-07 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 22/22] 22: perf: Documentation for perf uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-10 12:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-06-09 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 0/22] 0: Uprobes patchset with perf probe support Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 5:56 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2011-06-13 9:23 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-06-09 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 6:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-06-13 10:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110608221032.GA9965@wicker.gateway.2wire.net \
--to=wilsons@start.ca \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).