From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4156B0012 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:37:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p5AJ9XRO006344 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:09:33 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p5AJbF7U080976 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:37:15 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p5AJbEx2003272 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:37:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:37:13 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: Linux VM Infrastructure to support Memory Power Management Message-ID: <20110610193713.GJ2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20110610151121.GA2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110610155954.GA25774@srcf.ucam.org> <20110610165529.GC2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110610170535.GC25774@srcf.ucam.org> <20110610171939.GE2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110610172307.GA27630@srcf.ucam.org> <20110610175248.GF2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110610180807.GB28500@srcf.ucam.org> <20110610184738.GG2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110610192329.GA30496@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110610192329.GA30496@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Kyungmin Park , Andrew Morton , Ankita Garg , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thomas.abraham@linaro.org On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:23:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:47:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > And if I understand you correctly, then the patches that Ankita posted > > should help your self-refresh case, along with the originally intended > > the power-down case and special-purpose use of memory case. > > Yeah, I'd hope so once we actually have capable hardware. Cool!!! So Ankita's patchset might be useful to you at some point, then. Does it look like a reasonable implementation? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org