From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: P?draig Brady <P@draigBrady.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: sandy bridge kswapd0 livelock with pagecache
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110621143434.GI9396@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E008784.80107@draigBrady.com>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:59:00PM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
> On 21/06/11 12:34, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:47:35AM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
> >> On 21/06/11 11:39, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:53:02AM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
> >>>> I tried the 2 patches here to no avail:
> >>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=130503811704830&w=2
> >>>>
> >>>> I originally logged this at:
> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712019
> >>>>
> >>>> I can compile up and quickly test any suggestions.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I recently looked through what kswapd does and there are a number
> >>> of problem areas. Unfortunately, I haven't gotten around to doing
> >>> anything about it yet or running the test cases to see if they are
> >>> really problems. In your case, the following is a strong possibility
> >>> though. This should be applied on top of the two patches merged from
> >>> that thread.
> >>>
> >>> This is not tested in any way, based on 3.0-rc3
> >>
> >> This does not fix the issue here.
> >>
> >
> > I made a silly mistake here. When you mentioned two patches applied,
> > I assumed you meant two patches that were finally merged from that
> > discussion thread instead of looking at your linked mail. Now that I
> > have checked, I think you applied the SLUB patches while the patches
> > I was thinking of are;
> >
> > [afc7e326: mm: vmscan: correct use of pgdat_balanced in sleeping_prematurely]
> > [f06590bd: mm: vmscan: correctly check if reclaimer should schedule during shrink_slab]
> >
> > The first one in particular has been reported by another user to fix
> > hangs related to copying large files. I'm assuming you are testing
> > against the Fedora kernel. As these patches were merged for 3.0-rc1, can
> > you check if applying just these two patches to your kernel helps?
>
> These patches are already present in my 2.6.38.8-32.fc15.x86_64 kernel :(
>
While doing a review of patches for unrelated reasons between 2.6.38
and 3.0-rc3, I noted a few patches related to high CPU usage that may
not have made it to the Fedora kernel.
* d527caf2 mm: compaction: prevent kswapd compacting memory to reduce CPU usage
8afdcece mm: vmscan: kswapd should not free an excessive number of pages when balancing small zones
602605a4 mm: compaction: minimise the time IRQs are disabled while isolating free pages
b2eef8c0 mm: compaction: minimise the time IRQs are disabled while isolating pages for migration
* 929bea7c vmscan: all_unreclaimable() use zone->all_unreclaimable as a name
* afc7e326 mm: vmscan: correct use of pgdat_balanced in sleeping_prematurely
* f06590bd mm: vmscan: correctly check if reclaimer should schedule during shrink_slab
The ones marked * are already in 2.6.38.8 so presumably in the Fedora
kernel as well but worth double checking. Of the remaining patches,
patch 2 is the most relevant to your problem as it was explicitly
targeted at reclaiming during copying large amounts of data.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-21 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 9:53 sandy bridge kswapd0 livelock with pagecache Pádraig Brady
2011-06-21 10:39 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-21 10:47 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-21 11:34 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-21 11:59 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-21 13:07 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-21 14:23 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-22 9:44 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-22 10:19 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-23 11:46 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-23 13:04 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-23 15:24 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-23 15:32 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-23 16:59 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-23 19:25 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-24 11:44 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-24 13:10 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-24 15:04 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-24 6:33 ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-21 14:34 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-06-21 15:29 ` Pádraig Brady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110621143434.GI9396@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=P@draigBrady.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).