linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"bsingharora@gmail.com" <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Cleanup] memcg: export memory cgroup's swappiness v2
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:06:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110630180653.1df10f38.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110701092059.be4400f7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:20:59 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 08:50:13 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:01:34 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Ok, I'll check it. Maybe I miss !CONFIG_SWAP...
> > 
> 
> v4 here. Thank you for pointing out. I could think of several ways but
> maybe this one is good because using vm_swappines with !CONFIG_SWAP seems
> to be a bug.

No, it isn't a bug - swappiness also controls the kernel's eagerness to
unmap and reclaim mmapped pagecache.

> tested with allyesconfig/allnoconfig.

Did it break the above?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> +static int vmscan_swappiness(struct scan_control *sc)
> +{
> +	if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
> +		return vm_swappiness;

Well that's a bit ugly - it assumes that all callers set
scan_control.swappiness to vm_swappiness then never change it.  That
may be true in the current code.

Ho hum, I guess that's a simplification we can make.

> +	return mem_cgroup_swappiness(sc->mem_cgroup);
> +}
> +#else
> +static int vmscan_swappiness(struct scan_control *sc)
> +{
> +	/* Now, this function is never called with !CONFIG_SWAP */
> +	BUG();
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> ...
>
> @@ -1789,8 +1804,8 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  	 * With swappiness at 100, anonymous and file have the same priority.
>  	 * This scanning priority is essentially the inverse of IO cost.
>  	 */
> -	anon_prio = sc->swappiness;
> -	file_prio = 200 - sc->swappiness;
> +	anon_prio = vmscan_swappiness(sc);
> +	file_prio = 200 - vmscan_swappiness(sc);

hah, this should go BUG if CONFIG_SWAP=n.  But it won't, because we
broke get_scan_count().  It fails to apply vm_swappiness to file-backed
pages if there's no available swap, which is daft.

I think this happened in 76a33fc380c9a ("vmscan: prevent
get_scan_ratio() rounding errors") which claims "this patch doesn't
really change logics, but just increase precision".


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-01  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-29 10:03 [PATCH] [Cleanup] memcg: export memory cgroup's swappiness v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-29 12:20 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-29 13:00 ` Balbir Singh
2011-06-29 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-30  3:32   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-30  6:32     ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-30  7:10       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-30  7:33         ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-30 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-30 23:50   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-01  0:20     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-01  1:06       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-07-01  1:16         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-01  1:30           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-01  7:10             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-06  5:18               ` [PATCH] [Cleanup] memcg: export memory cgroup's swappiness v5 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110630180653.1df10f38.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).