From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail6.bemta8.messagelabs.com (mail6.bemta8.messagelabs.com [216.82.243.55]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA056B00F7 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:29:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:28:57 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices Message-Id: <20110719162857.63b6b0be.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20110617163854.49225203.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110617170742.282a1bd6.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110617171228.4c85fd38.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: akpm , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > And one Andrew Morton has a userspace radix tree test harness at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/rtth.tar.gz > > > > This should still be as relevant as it was before, but I notice its > > radix_tree.c is almost identical to the source currently in the kernel > > tree, so I ought at the least to keep it in synch. > > I was hoping to have dealt with this by now, Randy; but after downloading > an up-to-date urcu, I'm finding what's currently in rtth does not build > with it. Unlikely to be hard to fix, but means I'll have to defer it a > little while longer. Sure, not a problem. Thanks for not dropping it completely. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org