From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E0C6B0179 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:15:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:15:29 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] mm: new shrinker API Message-ID: <20110823091529.GC21492@infradead.org> References: <1314089786-20535-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1314089786-20535-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1314089786-20535-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, khlebnikov@openvz.org > /* > * A callback you can register to apply pressure to ageable caches. It's much more than just a single callback these days. > + * @scan_objects will be made from the current reclaim context. > */ > struct shrinker { > int (*shrink)(struct shrinker *, struct shrink_control *sc); > + long (*count_objects)(struct shrinker *, struct shrink_control *sc); > + long (*scan_objects)(struct shrinker *, struct shrink_control *sc); Is shrink_object really such a good name for this method? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org