linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] memcg: skip scanning active lists based on individual size
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:30:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110831123051.GA18081@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEwNFnBSg71QoLZbOqZbXK3fGEGneituU3PmiYTAw1VM3KcwcQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:13:34PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Reclaim decides to skip scanning an active list when the corresponding
> > inactive list is above a certain size in comparison to leave the
> > assumed working set alone while there are still enough reclaim
> > candidates around.
> >
> > The memcg implementation of comparing those lists instead reports
> > whether the whole memcg is low on the requested type of inactive
> > pages, considering all nodes and zones.
> >
> > This can lead to an oversized active list not being scanned because of
> > the state of the other lists in the memcg, as well as an active list
> > being scanned while its corresponding inactive list has enough pages.
> >
> > Not only is this wrong, it's also a scalability hazard, because the
> > global memory state over all nodes and zones has to be gathered for
> > each memcg and zone scanned.
> >
> > Make these calculations purely based on the size of the two LRU lists
> > that are actually affected by the outcome of the decision.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> > Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>

Thank you.

> I can't understand why memcg is designed for considering all nodes and zones.
> Is it a mistake or on purpose?
> Maybe Kame or Balbir can answer it.
> 
> Anyway, this change does make sense to me.
> 
> Nitpick: Please remove inactive_ratio in Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt.
> I think it would be better to separate it into another patch.

Good catch.

---
Subject: [patch] memcg: skip scanning active lists based on individual fix

Also ditch the documentation note for the removed stats value.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
index 06eb6d9..cc0ebc5 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
@@ -418,7 +418,6 @@ total_unevictable	- sum of all children's "unevictable"
 
 # The following additional stats are dependent on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.
 
-inactive_ratio		- VM internal parameter. (see mm/page_alloc.c)
 recent_rotated_anon	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
 recent_rotated_file	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
 recent_scanned_anon	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-31 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-31  9:08 [patch] memcg: skip scanning active lists based on individual size Johannes Weiner
2011-08-31 10:13 ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-31 12:30   ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-09-01  0:09   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-01  6:15     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-01  6:31       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-05 18:25         ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-06  9:33           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-06 10:43             ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-06 10:52               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-31 17:19 ` Ying Han
2011-08-31 18:27 ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110831123051.GA18081@redhat.com \
    --to=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).