From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: remove unneeded preempt_disable
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:58:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906095852.GA25053@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313650253-21794-1-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:50:53PM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> Both mem_cgroup_charge_statistics() and mem_cgroup_move_account() were
> unnecessarily disabling preemption when adjusting per-cpu counters:
> preempt_disable()
> __this_cpu_xxx()
> __this_cpu_yyy()
> preempt_enable()
>
> This change does not disable preemption and thus CPU switch is possible
> within these routines. This does not cause a problem because the total
> of all cpu counters is summed when reporting stats. Now both
> mem_cgroup_charge_statistics() and mem_cgroup_move_account() look like:
> this_cpu_xxx()
> this_cpu_yyy()
>
> Reported-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
I just noticed that both cases have preemption disabled anyway because
of the page_cgroup bit spinlock.
So removing the preempt_disable() is fine but we can even keep the
non-atomic __this_cpu operations.
Something like this instead?
---
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Subject: mm: memcg: remove needless recursive preemption disabling
Callsites of mem_cgroup_charge_statistics() hold the page_cgroup bit
spinlock, which implies disabled preemption.
The same goes for the explicit preemption disabling to account mapped
file pages in mem_cgroup_move_account().
The explicit disabling of preemption in both cases is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -618,8 +618,6 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_read_eve
static void mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
bool file, int nr_pages)
{
- preempt_disable();
-
if (file)
__this_cpu_add(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE], nr_pages);
else
@@ -634,8 +632,6 @@ static void mem_cgroup_charge_statistics
}
__this_cpu_add(mem->stat->events[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_COUNT], nr_pages);
-
- preempt_enable();
}
unsigned long
@@ -2582,10 +2578,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struc
if (PageCgroupFileMapped(pc)) {
/* Update mapped_file data for mem_cgroup */
- preempt_disable();
__this_cpu_dec(from->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
__this_cpu_inc(to->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
- preempt_enable();
}
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(from, PageCgroupCache(pc), -nr_pages);
if (uncharge)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-06 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-18 6:50 [PATCH] memcg: remove unneeded preempt_disable Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 6:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-18 9:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-18 14:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-08-18 14:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-18 18:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-08-18 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-19 0:00 ` Greg Thelen
2011-08-25 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-25 15:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-25 16:20 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-25 16:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-25 16:34 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-25 17:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-25 18:34 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-25 18:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-25 18:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-25 18:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-25 19:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-25 19:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-25 22:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-25 19:29 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-25 23:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-25 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 9:58 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-09-06 10:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-06 10:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-06 10:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-06 18:04 ` Greg Thelen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110906095852.GA25053@redhat.com \
--to=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).