From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E94A9400BF for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:05:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 20:01:39 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 26/26] uprobes: queue signals while thread is singlestepping. Message-ID: <20111005180139.GA5704@redhat.com> References: <20110920115938.25326.93059.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> <20110920120517.25326.57657.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> <1317128626.15383.61.camel@twins> <20110927131213.GE3685@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110927131213.GE3685@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Linux-mm , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , Masami Hiramatsu , Hugh Dickins , Christoph Hellwig , Andi Kleen , Thomas Gleixner , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , Jim Keniston , Roland McGrath , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , LKML Srikar, I am still reading this series, need more time to read this patch, but: On 09/27, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > I did a rethink and implemented this patch a little differently using > block_all_signals, unblock_all_signals. This wouldnt need the > #ifdeffery + no changes in kernel/signal.c No, Please don't. block_all_signals() must be killed. This interface simply do not work. At all. It is buggy as hell. I guess I should ping David Airlie again. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org