linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>,
	aarcange@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: Limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 17:02:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111009080255.GC23003@barrios-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318000643-27996-2-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>

On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 04:17:22PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> 
> When suffering from memory fragmentation due to unfreeable pages,
> THP page faults will repeatedly try to compact memory.  Due to the
> unfreeable pages, compaction fails.
> 
> Needless to say, at that point page reclaim also fails to create
> free contiguous 2MB areas.  However, that doesn't stop the current
> code from trying, over and over again, and freeing a minimum of 4MB
> (2UL << sc->order pages) at every single invocation.
> 
> This resulted in my 12GB system having 2-3GB free memory, a
> corresponding amount of used swap and very sluggish response times.
> 
> This can be avoided by having the direct reclaim code not reclaim from
> zones that already have plenty of free memory available for compaction.
> 
> If compaction still fails due to unmovable memory, doing additional
> reclaim will only hurt the system, not help.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>

-- 
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-09  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-07 15:17 [PATCH 0/2] Avoid excessive reclaim due to THP Mel Gorman
2011-10-07 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: Limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations Mel Gorman
2011-10-07 19:32   ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-07 20:18     ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-09  8:02   ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2011-10-07 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Abort reclaim/compaction if compaction can proceed Mel Gorman
2011-10-07 20:07   ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-07 20:24     ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-07 22:42       ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-09  8:04   ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-12 14:57   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111009080255.GC23003@barrios-desktop \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).