linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce vm_stat cacheline contention in __vm_enough_memory
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:50:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111014135055.GA28592@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111014122506.GB26737@sgi.com>

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:25:06AM -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 02:24:34PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:02:58 -0500 (CDT)
> > Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > If there are no updates occurring for a while (due to increased deltas
> > > > > and/or vmstat updates) then the vm_stat cacheline should be able to stay
> > > > > in shared mode in multiple processors and the performance should increase.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > We could cacheline align vm_stat[].  But the thing is pretty small - we
> > > > couild put each entry in its own cacheline.
> > > 
> > > Which in turn would increase the cache footprint of some key kernel
> > > functions (because they need multiple vm_stat entries) and cause eviction
> > > of other cachelines that then reduce overall system performance again.
> > 
> > Sure, but we gain performance by not having different CPUs treading on
> > each other when they update different vmstat fields.  Sometimes one
> > effect will win and other times the other effect will win.  Some
> > engineering is needed..
> 
> I think the first step is to determine the role (if any) that false sharing may be playing in this, since that's a simpler fix (cacheline align and pad the array).
>

Testing on a smaller machine with 46 writer threads in parallel (my original
test used 120).

Looks as though cache-aligning and padding the end of the vm_stat array
results in a ~150 MB/sec speedup.  This is a nice improvement for only 46
writer threads, though it's not the full ~250 MB/sec speedup I get from
setting OVERCOMMIT_NEVER.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-14 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20111012160202.GA18666@sgi.com>
2011-10-12 19:01 ` [PATCH] Reduce vm_stat cacheline contention in __vm_enough_memory Andrew Morton
2011-10-12 19:57   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-13 15:06     ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-13 15:59       ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-13 15:23     ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-10-13 15:54       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-13 20:50         ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-13 21:02           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-13 21:24             ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-14 12:25               ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-10-14 13:50                 ` Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2011-10-14 13:57                   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-14 14:19                     ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-10-14 14:34                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-14 15:18                         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-14 16:16                           ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-10-18 13:48                             ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-10-18 14:36                               ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-18 15:48                               ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-19  1:16                                 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-19 14:54                                   ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-10-19 15:31                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-24 14:59                                       ` Dimitri Sivanich
     [not found]   ` <CADE8fzrdMOBF1RyyEpMVi8aKcgOVKRQSKi0=c1Qvh3p6hHcXRA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-10-13  0:07     ` Tim Chen
2011-10-13 14:15       ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111014135055.GA28592@sgi.com \
    --to=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).