From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: avoid livelock on !__GFP_FS allocations
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:09:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111025090956.GA10797@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319524789-22818-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:39:49PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> Under the following conditions, __alloc_pages_slowpath can loop
> forever:
> gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT is true
> gfp_mask & __GFP_FS is false
> reclaim and compaction make no progress
> order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
>
> These conditions happen very often during suspend and resume,
> when pm_restrict_gfp_mask() effectively converts all GFP_KERNEL
> allocations into __GFP_WAIT.
b>
> The oom killer is not run because gfp_mask & __GFP_FS is false,
> but should_alloc_retry will always return true when order is less
> than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER.
>
> Fix __alloc_pages_slowpath to skip retrying when oom killer is
> not allowed by the GFP flags, the same way it would skip if the
> oom killer was allowed but disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Hi Colin,
Your patch functionally seems fine. I see the problem and we certainly
do not want to have the OOM killer firing during suspend. I would prefer
that the IO devices would not be suspended until reclaim was completed
but I imagine that would be a lot harder.
That said, it will be difficult to remember why checking __GFP_NOFAIL in
this case is necessary and someone might "optimitise" it away later. It
would be preferable if it was self-documenting. Maybe something like
this? (This is totally untested)
mm/page_alloc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 6e8ecb6..ad8f376 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -127,6 +127,20 @@ void pm_restrict_gfp_mask(void)
saved_gfp_mask = gfp_allowed_mask;
gfp_allowed_mask &= ~GFP_IOFS;
}
+
+static bool pm_suspending(void)
+{
+ if ((gfp_allowed_mask & GFP_IOFS) == GFP_IOFS)
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
+#else
+
+static bool pm_suspending(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_VARIABLE
@@ -2207,6 +2221,14 @@ rebalance:
goto restart;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Suspend converts GFP_KERNEL to __GFP_WAIT which can
+ * prevent reclaim making forward progress without
+ * invoking OOM. Bail if we are suspending
+ */
+ if (pm_suspending())
+ goto nopage;
}
/* Check if we should retry the allocation */
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-25 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-25 6:39 [PATCH] mm: avoid livelock on !__GFP_FS allocations Colin Cross
2011-10-25 7:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-25 7:51 ` Colin Cross
2011-10-25 8:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-25 22:12 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-25 9:09 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-10-25 9:26 ` Colin Cross
2011-10-25 11:23 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-25 17:08 ` Colin Cross
2011-11-01 12:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-25 19:39 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-01 12:29 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-25 19:29 ` Colin Cross
2011-10-25 22:18 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-26 1:46 ` Colin Cross
2011-10-26 5:47 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-26 6:12 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-26 6:16 ` Colin Cross
2011-10-26 6:24 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-26 6:26 ` Colin Cross
2011-10-26 6:33 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-26 6:36 ` Colin Cross
2011-10-26 6:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-26 6:57 ` Colin Cross
2011-10-26 7:10 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-26 7:22 ` Colin Cross
2011-11-01 12:36 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-25 22:10 ` David Rientjes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-14 14:04 Mel Gorman
2011-11-14 18:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-15 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-14 23:03 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-15 10:42 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 15:43 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 16:13 ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-15 17:36 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-16 0:22 ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-16 0:28 ` Colin Cross
2011-11-16 0:45 ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-16 7:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-16 21:44 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-16 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-16 22:07 ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-16 22:48 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-15 21:40 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-16 9:52 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-16 21:39 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111025090956.GA10797@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).