From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH resend] oom: do not kill tasks with oom_score_adj OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 12:59:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111109090919.C2D538AD27@mx2.suse.de> (raw)
c9f01245 (oom: remove oom_disable_count) has removed oom_disable_count
counter which has been used for early break out from oom_badness so we
could never select a task with oom_score_adj set to OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN
(oom disabled).
Now that the counter is gone we are always going through heuristics
calculation and we always return a non zero positive value. This
means that we can end up killing a task with OOM disabled because it is
indistinguishable from regular tasks with 1% resp. CAP_SYS_ADMIN tasks
with 3% usage of memory or tasks with oom_score_adj set but OOM enabled.
Let's break out early if the task should have OOM disabled.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index e916168..4465fb8 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
if (!p)
return 0;
+ if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) {
+ task_unlock(p);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/*
* The memory controller may have a limit of 0 bytes, so avoid a divide
* by zero, if necessary.
--
1.7.7.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2011-11-09 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-04 11:59 Michal Hocko [this message]
2011-11-09 18:24 ` [PATCH resend] oom: do not kill tasks with oom_score_adj OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN Ying Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111109090919.C2D538AD27@mx2.suse.de \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).