From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@suse.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thp: reduce khugepaged freezing latency
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:33:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111109173308.GK5075@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111109170657.GE1260@google.com>
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 09:06:57AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Ah, crap, still waking up. Sorry about that. So, yes, there's a race
> condition above. You need to set TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before testing
> freezing and use schedule_timeout() instead of
Yep that's the race I was thinking about. I see the wakeup in the
no-signal case avoids the race in wait_even_freezable_timeout so that
is ok but it'd race if I were just to add try_to_freeze before calling
schedule_timeout_interruptible.
> schedule_timeout_interruptible(). Was getting confused with
> prepare_to_wait(). That said, why not use prepare_to_wait() instead?
Because I don't need to wait on a waitqueue there. A THP failure
occurred, that caused some CPU overload and it's usually happening at
time of heavy VM stress, so I don't want to retry and cause more CPU
load from khugepaged until after some time even if more wakeups come
by. khugepaged is a very low cost background op, so it shouldn't cause
unnecessary CPU usage at times of VM pressure, waiting a better time
later is better.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-09 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-08 8:33 khugepaged doesn't want to freeze Jiri Slaby
2011-11-08 15:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-08 15:29 ` [PATCH] thp: reduce khugepaged freezing latency Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-08 20:01 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-09 0:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-09 9:03 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-09 12:45 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-09 15:53 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-09 16:20 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-09 16:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-09 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-09 17:02 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-09 17:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-09 18:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-09 18:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-09 18:34 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-09 19:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-11 12:20 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-11-09 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-09 17:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111109173308.GK5075@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@suse.com \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).