linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	mel <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5]thp: split huge page if head page is isolated
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:18:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111110031848.GA9974@barrios-laptop.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320893167.22361.237.camel@sli10-conroe>

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:46:07AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 10:23 +0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > So long contents.
> > Let's remove it.
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:07:10AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > > > > Coudn't we make both sides good?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Here is my quick patch.
> > > > > How about this?
> > > > > It doesn't split THPs in page_list but still reclaims non-THPs so
> > > > > I think it doesn't changed old behavior a lot.
> > > > I like this idea, will do some test soon.
> > > hmm, this doesn't work as expected. The putback_lru_page() messes lru.
> > > This isn't a problem if the page will be written since
> > > rotate_reclaimable_page() will fix the order. I got worse data than my
> > > v2 patch, eg, more thp_fallbacks, mess lru order, more pages are
> > > scanned. We could add something like putback_lru_page_tail, but I'm not
> > 
> > Hmm, It's not LRU mess problem. but it's just guessing and you might be right
> > because you have a workload and can test it.
> > 
> > My guessing is that cull_mlocked reset synchronus page reclaim.
> > Could you test this patch, again?
> no, I traced it, and lru mess. putback_lru_page() adds the page to lru
> head instead of tail.

I knew LRU mess happens but I mean I am not sure the culprit is it.

> 
> > And, if the problem cause by LRU mess, I think it is valuable with adding putback_lru_page_tail
> > because thp added lru_add_page_tail, too.
> I want to put all remaining pages back to lru tail if a huge page is
> split, because enough pages are reclaimed. So this needs adding
> something like putback_lru_pages_tail(), not complicated, but a lot of
> code. And if there are parallel reclaimer, we still have lru mess. My
> test already shows it. Still worthy?

If parallel reclaim happens, it can spoil everything. It's really really bad.
I perfer adding putback_lru_page_tail with isoloation trick because probably
we can use it later about pages which was not able to reclaim by some causes temporally.

> 
> Thanks,
> Shaohua
> 

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2011-11-10  3:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-25  2:59 [patch 5/5]thp: split huge page if head page is isolated Shaohua Li
2011-10-27 23:34 ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-28  5:11   ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-28  7:30     ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-28  8:25       ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-28  9:50         ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-31  1:10           ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-31  8:24             ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-29  0:06 ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-31  1:21   ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-31  8:23     ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-31  9:03       ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-02  3:17         ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-08  8:59           ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-09  5:27             ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-09  6:28               ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-09  7:08                 ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10  2:07                   ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10  2:23                     ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-10  2:46                       ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10  3:18                         ` Minchan Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111110031848.GA9974@barrios-laptop.redhat.com \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).