linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not stall in synchronous compaction for THP allocations
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:00:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111115020009.GE4414@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111114160345.01e94987.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:03:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:01:56 +0000
> Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> > A 1000-hour compute job will have its pages collapsed into hugepages by
> > khugepaged so they might not have the huge pages at the very beginning
> > but they get them. With khugepaged in place, there should be no need for
> > an additional tuneable.
> 
> OK...

It's good idea to keep it monitored. But I guess the reduced rate will
only materialize at temporary VM stress times.

> Fair enough.  One slight problem though:
> 
> akpm:/usr/src/25> grep -r thp_collapse_alloc_failed Documentation 
> akpm:/usr/src/25> 

I didn't fill that gap but I was reading the code again and I don't
see why we keep retrying for -EAGAIN in the !sync case. Maybe the
below is good (untested). I doubt it's good to spend cpu to retry the
trylock or to retry the migrate on a pinned page by O_DIRECT. In fact
as far as THP success rate is concerned maybe we should "goto out"
instead of "goto fail" but I didn't change to that as compaction even
if it fails a subpage may still be successful at creating order
1/2/3/4...8 pages. I only avoid 9 loops to retry a trylock or a page
under O_DIRECT. Maybe that will save a bit of CPU, I doubt it can
decrease the success rate in any significant way. I'll test it at the
next build...

====
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] migrate: !sync don't retry

For !sync it's not worth retrying because we won't lock_page even
after the second pass. So make -EAGAIN behave like -EBUSY in the !sync
should be faster. The difference between -EAGAIN and -EBUSY remains as
usual for the sync case, where -EAGAIN will retry, while -EBUSY will
not.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
---
 mm/migrate.c |   16 +++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 578e291..7d97a14 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -680,11 +680,7 @@ static int __unmap_and_move(struct page *page, struct page *newpage,
 		 * For !sync, there is no point retrying as the retry loop
 		 * is expected to be too short for PageWriteback to be cleared
 		 */
-		if (!sync) {
-			rc = -EBUSY;
-			goto uncharge;
-		}
-		if (!force)
+		if (!force || !sync)
 			goto uncharge;
 		wait_on_page_writeback(page);
 	}
@@ -794,7 +790,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private,
 
 	rc = __unmap_and_move(page, newpage, force, offlining, sync);
 out:
-	if (rc != -EAGAIN) {
+	if (rc != -EAGAIN || !sync) {
 		/*
 		 * A page that has been migrated has all references
 		 * removed and will be freed. A page that has not been
@@ -874,7 +870,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move_huge_page(new_page_t get_new_page,
 out:
 	unlock_page(hpage);
 
-	if (rc != -EAGAIN) {
+	if (rc != -EAGAIN || !sync) {
 		list_del(&hpage->lru);
 		put_page(hpage);
 	}
@@ -934,11 +930,14 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from,
 			case -ENOMEM:
 				goto out;
 			case -EAGAIN:
+				if (!sync)
+					goto fail;
 				retry++;
 				break;
 			case 0:
 				break;
 			default:
+			fail:
 				/* Permanent failure */
 				nr_failed++;
 				break;
@@ -981,11 +980,14 @@ int migrate_huge_pages(struct list_head *from,
 			case -ENOMEM:
 				goto out;
 			case -EAGAIN:
+				if (!sync)
+					goto fail;
 				retry++;
 				break;
 			case 0:
 				break;
 			default:
+			fail:
 				/* Permanent failure */
 				nr_failed++;
 				break;

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-15  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-10 10:06 [PATCH] mm: Do not stall in synchronous compaction for THP allocations Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 10:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-11-10 10:51 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-10 12:06   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-11-10 14:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10 14:22 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 15:12   ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-10 16:13     ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 16:30       ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-10 16:48         ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 23:12       ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-10 23:37         ` David Rientjes
2011-11-11 10:14           ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-11 10:39             ` David Rientjes
2011-11-11 11:17               ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-11 14:21               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-14 23:44             ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-15 13:25               ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 21:07                 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-15 23:48                   ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-16  0:07                     ` David Rientjes
2011-11-16  4:13                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-16 13:30                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-16 15:07                           ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-18 17:59                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-16 14:14                         ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-11 10:01         ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15  0:03           ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-15  2:00             ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2011-11-15  2:08               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-15 15:01                 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 15:00               ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 13:07             ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 15:47               ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111115020009.GE4414@redhat.com \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).