From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:36:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111214063625.GA13824@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111129152106.GN5635@quack.suse.cz>
> This looks all inherently racy (which doesn't matter much as you suggest)
> so I just wanted to suggest that if you used per-cpu counters you'd get
> race-free and faster code at the cost of larger data structures and using
> percpu_counter_add() instead of ++ (which doesn't seem like a big
> complication to me).
OK, here is the incremental patch to use per-cpu counters :)
---
mm/readahead.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/readahead.c 2011-12-14 09:50:37.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/readahead.c 2011-12-14 14:16:15.000000000 +0800
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum ra_account {
RA_ACCOUNT_MAX,
};
-static unsigned long ra_stats[RA_PATTERN_MAX][RA_ACCOUNT_MAX];
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long[RA_PATTERN_ALL][RA_ACCOUNT_MAX], ra_stat);
static void readahead_stats(struct address_space *mapping,
pgoff_t offset,
@@ -83,38 +83,62 @@ static void readahead_stats(struct addre
{
pgoff_t eof = ((i_size_read(mapping->host)-1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) + 1;
-recount:
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_COUNT]++;
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_SIZE] += size;
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_ASYNC_SIZE] += async_size;
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_ACTUAL] += actual;
+ preempt_disable();
+
+ __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_COUNT]);
+ __this_cpu_add(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_SIZE], size);
+ __this_cpu_add(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_ASYNC_SIZE], async_size);
+ __this_cpu_add(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_ACTUAL], actual);
if (start + size >= eof)
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_EOF]++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_EOF]);
if (actual < size)
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_CACHE_HIT]++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_CACHE_HIT]);
if (actual) {
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_IOCOUNT]++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_IOCOUNT]);
if (start <= offset && offset < start + size)
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_SYNC]++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_SYNC]);
if (for_mmap)
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_MMAP]++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_MMAP]);
if (for_metadata)
- ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_METADATA]++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_METADATA]);
}
- if (pattern != RA_PATTERN_ALL) {
- pattern = RA_PATTERN_ALL;
- goto recount;
- }
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+
+static void ra_stats_clear(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ int i, j;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ for (i = 0; i < RA_PATTERN_ALL; i++)
+ for (j = 0; j < RA_ACCOUNT_MAX; j++)
+ per_cpu(ra_stat[i][j], cpu) = 0;
+}
+
+static void ra_stats_sum(unsigned long ra_stats[RA_PATTERN_MAX][RA_ACCOUNT_MAX])
+{
+ int cpu;
+ int i, j;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ for (i = 0; i < RA_PATTERN_ALL; i++)
+ for (j = 0; j < RA_ACCOUNT_MAX; j++) {
+ unsigned long n = per_cpu(ra_stat[i][j], cpu);
+ ra_stats[i][j] += n;
+ ra_stats[RA_PATTERN_ALL][j] += n;
+ }
}
static int readahead_stats_show(struct seq_file *s, void *_)
{
unsigned long i;
+ unsigned long ra_stats[RA_PATTERN_MAX][RA_ACCOUNT_MAX];
seq_printf(s,
"%-10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s\n",
@@ -122,6 +146,9 @@ static int readahead_stats_show(struct s
"io", "sync_io", "mmap_io", "meta_io",
"size", "async_size", "io_size");
+ memset(ra_stats, 0, sizeof(ra_stats));
+ ra_stats_sum(ra_stats);
+
for (i = 0; i < RA_PATTERN_MAX; i++) {
unsigned long count = ra_stats[i][RA_ACCOUNT_COUNT];
unsigned long iocount = ra_stats[i][RA_ACCOUNT_IOCOUNT];
@@ -159,7 +186,7 @@ static int readahead_stats_open(struct i
static ssize_t readahead_stats_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t size, loff_t *offset)
{
- memset(ra_stats, 0, sizeof(ra_stats));
+ ra_stats_clear();
return size;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-14 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-29 13:09 [PATCH 0/9] readahead stats/tracing, backwards prefetching and more (v2) Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 13:09 ` [PATCH 1/9] block: limit default readahead size for small devices Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/9] readahead: snap readahead request to EOF Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 14:29 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-30 1:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-30 11:37 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-30 12:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/9] readahead: record readahead patterns Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 14:40 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-29 17:57 ` Andi Kleen
2011-11-30 1:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-15 8:55 ` [PATCH] proc: show readahead state in fdinfo Wu Fengguang
2011-12-15 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-11-29 13:09 ` [PATCH 4/9] readahead: tag mmap page fault call sites Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 14:41 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-29 13:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] readahead: tag metadata " Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 14:45 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-29 13:09 ` [PATCH 6/9] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 15:21 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-30 0:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-14 6:36 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-12-19 16:32 ` Jan Kara
2011-12-21 1:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-21 4:06 ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-23 3:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-23 11:16 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-29 13:09 ` [PATCH 7/9] readahead: add vfs/readahead tracing event Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 15:22 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-30 0:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-30 11:44 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-30 12:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-06 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-07 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-08 9:03 ` [PATCH] writeback: show writeback reason with __print_symbolic Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 13:09 ` [PATCH 8/9] readahead: basic support for backwards prefetching Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 15:35 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-29 16:37 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-11-30 0:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-30 0:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-30 11:21 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-29 13:09 ` [PATCH 9/9] readahead: dont do start-of-file readahead after lseek() Wu Fengguang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-27 3:05 [PATCH 0/9] readahead stats/tracing, backwards prefetching and more (v4) Wu Fengguang
2012-01-27 3:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats Wu Fengguang
2012-01-27 16:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-27 20:15 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-29 5:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-30 4:02 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-11 4:31 [PATCH 0/9] readahead stats/tracing, backwards prefetching and more (v5) Wu Fengguang
2012-02-11 4:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111214063625.GA13824@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).