From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] mm: bootmem: try harder to free pages in bulk
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:20:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111214202032.GA24496@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323784711-1937-5-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:58:31PM +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The loop that frees pages to the page allocator while bootstrapping
> tries to free higher-order blocks only when the starting address is
> aligned to that block size. Otherwise it will free all pages on that
> node one-by-one.
>
> Change it to free individual pages up to the first aligned block and
> then try higher-order frees from there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
I gave all four patches a try now on my ARM machine and it still works
fine. But note that this patch isn't really tested, because for me
free_all_bootmem_core is only called once and that with an aligned
address.
But at least you didn't broke that case :-)
Having said that, I wonder if the code does the right thing for
unaligned start. (That is, it's wrong to start testing for bit 0 of
map[idx / BITS_PER_LONG], isn't it?) But if that's the case that's not
something you introduced in this series.
One more comment below.
> ---
> mm/bootmem.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/bootmem.c b/mm/bootmem.c
> index 1aea171..668e94d 100644
> --- a/mm/bootmem.c
> +++ b/mm/bootmem.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ void __init free_bootmem_late(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
>
> static unsigned long __init free_all_bootmem_core(bootmem_data_t *bdata)
> {
> - int aligned;
> struct page *page;
> unsigned long start, end, pages, count = 0;
>
> @@ -181,14 +180,8 @@ static unsigned long __init free_all_bootmem_core(bootmem_data_t *bdata)
> start = bdata->node_min_pfn;
> end = bdata->node_low_pfn;
>
> - /*
> - * If the start is aligned to the machines wordsize, we might
> - * be able to free pages in bulks of that order.
> - */
> - aligned = !(start & (BITS_PER_LONG - 1));
> -
> - bdebug("nid=%td start=%lx end=%lx aligned=%d\n",
> - bdata - bootmem_node_data, start, end, aligned);
> + bdebug("nid=%td start=%lx end=%lx\n",
> + bdata - bootmem_node_data, start, end);
>
> while (start < end) {
> unsigned long *map, idx, vec;
> @@ -196,12 +189,17 @@ static unsigned long __init free_all_bootmem_core(bootmem_data_t *bdata)
> map = bdata->node_bootmem_map;
> idx = start - bdata->node_min_pfn;
> vec = ~map[idx / BITS_PER_LONG];
> -
> - if (aligned && vec == ~0UL) {
> + /*
> + * If we have a properly aligned and fully unreserved
> + * BITS_PER_LONG block of pages in front of us, free
> + * it in one go.
> + */
> + if (IS_ALIGNED(start, BITS_PER_LONG) && vec == ~0UL) {
> int order = ilog2(BITS_PER_LONG);
>
> __free_pages_bootmem(pfn_to_page(start), order);
> count += BITS_PER_LONG;
> + start += BITS_PER_LONG;
> } else {
> unsigned long off = 0;
>
> @@ -214,8 +212,8 @@ static unsigned long __init free_all_bootmem_core(bootmem_data_t *bdata)
> vec >>= 1;
> off++;
> }
> + start = ALIGN(start + 1, BITS_PER_LONG);
> }
> - start += BITS_PER_LONG;
I don't know if the compiler would be more happy if you would just use
start = ALIGN(start + 1, BITS_PER_LONG);
unconditionally and drop
start += BITS_PER_LONG
in the if block?!
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-Konig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-14 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-13 13:58 [patch 0/4] mm: bootmem / page allocator bootstrap fixlets Johannes Weiner
2011-12-13 13:58 ` [patch 1/4] mm: page_alloc: remove order assumption from __free_pages_bootmem() Johannes Weiner
2011-12-13 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-13 13:58 ` [patch 2/4] mm: page_alloc: generalize order handling in __free_pages_bootmem() Johannes Weiner
2011-12-13 13:58 ` [patch 3/4] mm: bootmem: drop superfluous range check when freeing pages in bulk Johannes Weiner
2011-12-13 15:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-12-13 15:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-12-13 13:58 ` [patch 4/4] mm: bootmem: try harder to free " Johannes Weiner
2011-12-14 20:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-12-14 20:42 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111214202032.GA24496@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).