linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: take pagevecs off reclaim stack
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:20:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120104122025.b0890e7e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1201031900140.1378@eggly.anvils>

On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:22:42 -0800 (PST)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:

> > > > 
> > > > Now, a way out here is to remove lumpy reclaim (please).  And make the
> > > > problem not come back by promising to never call putback_lru_pages(lots
> > > > of pages) (how do we do this?).
> > > 
> > > We can very easily put a counter in it, doing a spin_unlock_irq every
> > > time we hit the max.  Nothing prevents that, it's just an excrescence
> > > I'd have preferred to omit and have not today implemented.
> > 
> > Yes.  It's ultra-cautious, but perhaps we should do this at least until
> > lumpy goes away.
> 
> I don't think you'll accept my observations above as excuse to do
> nothing, but please clarify which you think is more cautious.  Should
> I or should I not break up the isolating end in the same way as the
> putting back?

If we already have the latency problem at the isolate_lru_pages() stage
then I suppose we can assume that nobody is noticing it, so we'll
probably be OK.

For a while.  Someone will complain at some stage and we'll probably
end up busting this work into chunks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2012-01-04 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-29  4:32 [PATCH 0/3] mm: three minor vmscan improvements Hugh Dickins
2011-12-29  4:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: test PageSwapBacked in lumpy reclaim Hugh Dickins
2011-12-29  5:06   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-04  1:23   ` Minchan Kim
2012-01-05  6:03   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-29  4:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: cond_resched in scan_mapping_unevictable_pages Hugh Dickins
2011-12-29  5:14   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-29  5:48     ` Hugh Dickins
2011-12-29 22:46       ` Hugh Dickins
2011-12-29  4:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: take pagevecs off reclaim stack Hugh Dickins
2011-12-29  5:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-29 11:18   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-12-29 22:20     ` Hugh Dickins
2011-12-29 22:55   ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-29 23:27     ` Hugh Dickins
2011-12-30  0:24       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-30  1:55         ` Hugh Dickins
2011-12-30  3:59           ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-30 15:51             ` Mel Gorman
2012-01-01  7:18             ` Hugh Dickins
2012-01-03 23:12               ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-03 23:17                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-03 23:29                   ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-04  0:03                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-04  3:22                 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-01-04 20:20                   ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120104122025.b0890e7e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).