* [PATCH] mm/compaction : check the watermark when cc->order is -1
@ 2011-12-31 6:18 Huang Shijie
2012-01-05 10:53 ` Mel Gorman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huang Shijie @ 2011-12-31 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: mgorman, linux-mm, Huang Shijie
We get cc->order is -1 when user echos to /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory.
In this case, we should check that if we have enough pages for
the compaction in the zone.
If we do not check this, in our MX6Q board(arm), i ever observed
COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages were compaction failed in per migrate_pages().
That's mean we can not alloc any pages by the free scanner in the zone.
This patch checks the watermark to avoid this problem.
Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
---
mm/compaction.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 899d956..0f12cc9 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -442,8 +442,13 @@ static int compact_finished(struct zone *zone,
* order == -1 is expected when compacting via
* /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
*/
- if (cc->order == -1)
+ if (cc->order == -1) {
+ /* Check if we have enough pages now. */
+ watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone) + COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX * 2;
+ if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, 0))
+ return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
+ }
/* Compaction run is not finished if the watermark is not met */
watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone);
@@ -482,8 +487,13 @@ unsigned long compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order)
* order == -1 is expected when compacting via
* /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
*/
- if (order == -1)
+ if (order == -1) {
+ /* Check if we have enough pages now. */
+ watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone) + COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX * 2;
+ if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, 0))
+ return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
+ }
/*
* Watermarks for order-0 must be met for compaction. Note the 2UL.
--
1.7.3.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/compaction : check the watermark when cc->order is -1
2011-12-31 6:18 [PATCH] mm/compaction : check the watermark when cc->order is -1 Huang Shijie
@ 2012-01-05 10:53 ` Mel Gorman
2012-01-05 11:21 ` Huang Shijie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2012-01-05 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huang Shijie; +Cc: akpm, linux-mm
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 02:18:43PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> We get cc->order is -1 when user echos to /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory.
> In this case, we should check that if we have enough pages for
> the compaction in the zone.
>
> If we do not check this, in our MX6Q board(arm), i ever observed
> COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages were compaction failed in per migrate_pages().
> That's mean we can not alloc any pages by the free scanner in the zone.
>
> This patch checks the watermark to avoid this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 899d956..0f12cc9 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -442,8 +442,13 @@ static int compact_finished(struct zone *zone,
> * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
> * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
> */
> - if (cc->order == -1)
> + if (cc->order == -1) {
> + /* Check if we have enough pages now. */
> + watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone) + COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX * 2;
> + if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, 0))
> + return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
> return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
> + }
>
We already do the watermark check in compact_finished. Would moving
the cc->order == -1 check below it not be functionally equivalent? This
would be preferable to duplicating the code for the watermark check.
Same for the second check in your patch.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/compaction : check the watermark when cc->order is -1
2012-01-05 10:53 ` Mel Gorman
@ 2012-01-05 11:21 ` Huang Shijie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huang Shijie @ 2012-01-05 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman; +Cc: akpm, linux-mm
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 02:18:43PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
>> We get cc->order is -1 when user echos to /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory.
>> In this case, we should check that if we have enough pages for
>> the compaction in the zone.
>>
>> If we do not check this, in our MX6Q board(arm), i ever observed
>> COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages were compaction failed in per migrate_pages().
>> That's mean we can not alloc any pages by the free scanner in the zone.
>>
>> This patch checks the watermark to avoid this problem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie<b32955@freescale.com>
>> ---
>> mm/compaction.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index 899d956..0f12cc9 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -442,8 +442,13 @@ static int compact_finished(struct zone *zone,
>> * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
>> * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
>> */
>> - if (cc->order == -1)
>> + if (cc->order == -1) {
>> + /* Check if we have enough pages now. */
>> + watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone) + COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX * 2;
>> + if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, 0))
>> + return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
>> return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
>> + }
>>
> We already do the watermark check in compact_finished. Would moving
> the cc->order == -1 check below it not be functionally equivalent? This
Now, I think these code for compact_finish() is not needed. These lines
can be removed.
The watermark check in the compaction_suitable() is enough to avoid the
problem.
Huang Shijie
> would be preferable to duplicating the code for the watermark check.
>
> Same for the second check in your patch.
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-05 11:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-31 6:18 [PATCH] mm/compaction : check the watermark when cc->order is -1 Huang Shijie
2012-01-05 10:53 ` Mel Gorman
2012-01-05 11:21 ` Huang Shijie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).