From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx207.postini.com [74.125.245.207]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 188246B006C for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:53:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:54:16 +0200 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [RESEND, PATCH 4/6] memcg: fix broken boolean expression Message-ID: <20120116115416.GA25687@shutemov.name> References: <1325883472-5614-1-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name> <1325883472-5614-4-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name> <20120109140404.GG3588@cmpxchg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120109140404.GG3588@cmpxchg.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Johannes Weiner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Balbir Singh , Michal Hocko , stable@kernel.org On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:04:04PM +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:57:50PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" > > > > action != CPU_DEAD || action != CPU_DEAD_FROZEN is always true. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > > Cc: > > I think you don't need to actually CC stable via email. If you > include that tag, they will pick it up once the patch hits mainline. I don't think it's a problem for stable@. > > The changelog is too terse, doubly so for a patch that should go into > stable. How is the code supposed to work? What are the consequences > of the bug? Is it enough? ---