From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:50:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120131085057.GS29272@MAIL.13thfloor.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327999722.2422.11.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:48:42AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 31 janvier 2012 a 15:59 +0800, Shaohua Li a ecrit :
>> Herbert Poetzl reported a performance regression since 2.6.39. The test
>> is a simple dd read, but with big block size. The reason is:
>> T1: ra (A, A+128k), (A+128k, A+256k)
>> T2: lock_page for page A, submit the 256k
>> T3: hit page A+128K, ra (A+256k, A+384). the range isn't submitted
>> because of plug and there isn't any lock_page till we hit page A+256k
>> because all pages from A to A+256k is in memory
>> T4: hit page A+256k, ra (A+384, A+ 512). Because of plug, the range isn't
>> submitted again.
>> T5: lock_page A+256k, so (A+256k, A+512k) will be submitted. The task is
>> waitting for (A+256k, A+512k) finish.
>> There is no request to disk in T3 and T4, so readahead pipeline breaks.
>> We really don't need block plug for generic_file_aio_read() for buffered
>> I/O. The readahead already has plug and has fine grained control when I/O
>> should be submitted. Deleting plug for buffered I/O fixes the regression.
>> One side effect is plug makes the request size 256k, the size is 128k
>> without it. This is because default ra size is 128k and not a reason we
>> need plug here.
>> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
>> Tested-by: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
>> Tested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Hmm, this is not exactly the patch I tested from Wu Fengguang
> I'll test this one before adding my "Tested-by: ..."
second that
>> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
>> index 97f49ed..b662757 100644
>> --- a/mm/filemap.c
>> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
>> @@ -1400,15 +1400,12 @@ generic_file_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
>> unsigned long seg = 0;
>> size_t count;
>> loff_t *ppos = &iocb->ki_pos;
>> - struct blk_plug plug;
>> count = 0;
>> retval = generic_segment_checks(iov, &nr_segs, &count, VERIFY_WRITE);
>> if (retval)
>> return retval;
>> - blk_start_plug(&plug);
>> -
>> /* coalesce the iovecs and go direct-to-BIO for O_DIRECT */
>> if (filp->f_flags & O_DIRECT) {
>> loff_t size;
>> @@ -1424,8 +1421,12 @@ generic_file_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
>> retval = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, pos,
>> pos + iov_length(iov, nr_segs) - 1);
>> if (!retval) {
>> + struct blk_plug plug;
>> +
>> + blk_start_plug(&plug);
> This part was not on the tested patch yesterday.
yep, will test this one tonight ...
>> retval = mapping->a_ops->direct_IO(READ, iocb,
>> iov, pos, nr_segs);
>> + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>> }
>> if (retval > 0) {
>> *ppos = pos + retval;
>> @@ -1481,7 +1482,6 @@ generic_file_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
>> break;
>> }
>> out:
>> - blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>> return retval;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_file_aio_read);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-31 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-31 7:59 [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug Shaohua Li
2012-01-31 8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 8:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31 8:50 ` Herbert Poetzl [this message]
2012-01-31 8:53 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31 9:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31 10:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 10:34 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 10:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 11:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 11:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 12:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-02-01 2:25 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31 14:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 20:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 22:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 22:13 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-31 22:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 3:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 7:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-02-01 16:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-01 20:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 20:13 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-02-01 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-01 7:02 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120131085057.GS29272@MAIL.13thfloor.at \
--to=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).