From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: compaction: make compact_control order signed
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:24:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120201132415.b09d8710.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F29ABD6.70704@redhat.com>
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:17:10 -0500
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct compact_control {
> >> unsigned long migrate_pfn; /* isolate_migratepages search base */
> >> bool sync; /* Synchronous migration */
> >>
> >> - unsigned int order; /* order a direct compactor needs */
> >> + int order; /* order a direct compactor needs */
> >> int migratetype; /* MOVABLE, RECLAIMABLE etc */
> >> struct zone *zone;
> >> };
> >
> > One would expect this to significantly change the behaviour of
> > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory. Enfeebled minds want to know: is
> > the new behaviour better or worse than the old behaviour?
>
> The old behaviour and the behaviour post Dan's fix are the
> same.
>
> My patch temporarily broke things, by testing for order < 0,
> instead of the explicit cc->order == -1 used elsewhere in
> the code.
>
> I did not notice it in my own testing because I tested on
> 3.2.0 and sent you patches against 3.3-current. It looks
> like this line of code is the one difference between both
> trees I was working on :(
>
> In my test tree, I had (cc->sync || !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order)).
>
> Arguably, testing for cc->order == -1 (or cc->order < 0) is
> better anyway.
I suppose it would be nicer to make the code in __compact_pgdat() match
all the other places whcih do this:
--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-make-compact_control-order-signed-fix
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static int __compact_pgdat(pg_data_t *pg
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc->freepages);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc->migratepages);
- if (cc->order < 0 || !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
+ if (cc->order == -1 || !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
compact_zone(zone, cc);
if (cc->order > 0) {
_
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 14:41 [patch] mm: compaction: make compact_control order signed Dan Carpenter
2012-02-01 14:59 ` Rik van Riel
2012-02-01 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-01 21:17 ` Rik van Riel
2012-02-01 21:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-02-01 21:28 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120201132415.b09d8710.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).