From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx178.postini.com [74.125.245.178]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E47C76B00E7 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:07:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:07:49 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: exit_mmap() BUG_ON triggering since 3.1 Message-Id: <20120305120749.b843fbde.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120305195952.GC17489@zod.bos.redhat.com> References: <20120215183317.GA26977@redhat.com> <20120216070753.GA23585@redhat.com> <20120216214245.GD23585@redhat.com> <20120302145811.93bb49e9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120305195952.GC17489@zod.bos.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Josh Boyer Cc: Hugh Dickins , Andrea Arcangeli , Dave Jones , David Rientjes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fedoraproject.org On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:59:53 -0500 Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:09:29PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:53:32 -0800 (PST) > > > Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > > > > Subject: Re: exit_mmap() BUG_ON triggering since 3.1 > > > > ... > > > > Subject: [PATCH] mm: thp: fix BUG on mm->nr_ptes > > > > > > So it's needed in 3.1.x and 3.2.x? > > > > Indeed it would be needed in -stable, thanks, I forgot to add that. > > > > And although Fedora only got reports from 3.1 onwards, I believe it > > would equally be needed in 3.0.x. 3.1.x is closed down now, but > > 3.0.x and 3.2.x are still open. > > > > I've not yet tried applying it to the latest of either of those: maybe > > it applies cleanly and correctly, but I could imagine movements too. > > But the first step, yes, is to Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > I don't see this in linux-next, 3.3-rcX, the stable-queue, or really > anywhere at all at the moment. Did the patch get swallowed up by some > kind of evil code Eagle of Doom before making it into the safety of a > tree somewhere? I have it queued for 3.3. It's taking a while to get things into -next at present because they're breaking things faster than I can fix them :( -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org