From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx140.postini.com [74.125.245.140]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28E8B6B004A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:21:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:20:46 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/26] sched/numa Message-ID: <20120319142046.GP24602@redhat.com> References: <20120316144028.036474157@chello.nl> <4F670325.7080700@redhat.com> <1332155527.18960.292.camel@twins> <20120319130401.GI24602@redhat.com> <1332164371.18960.339.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1332164371.18960.339.camel@twins> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Avi Kivity , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Paul Turner , Suresh Siddha , Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , Lai Jiangshan , Dan Smith , Bharata B Rao , Lee Schermerhorn , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:39:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:04 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > In implementation terms the scheduler is simplified and it won't work > > as well as it should with massive CPU overcommit. But I had to take > > shortcuts to keep the complexity down to O(N) where N is the number of > > CPUS > > Yeah I saw that, you essentially put a nr_cpus loop inside schedule(), > obviously that's not going to ever happen. lol Would be fun if such a simplification would still perform better than your code :). Yeah I'll try to fix that but it's massively complex and frankly benchmarking wise it won't help much fixing that... so it's beyond the end of my todo list. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org