From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:22:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120405222221.GF19166@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120405222024.GA19154@redhat.com>
Kill the no longer needed uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id code.
It doesn't really work anyway. synchronize_srcu() can only synchronize
with the code "inside" the srcu_read_lock/srcu_read_unlock section,
while uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier() does srcu_read_lock() _after_ we
already hit the breakpoint.
I guess this probably works "in practice". synchronize_srcu() is slow
and it implies synchronize_sched(), and the probed task enters the non-
preemptible section at the start of exception handler. Still this is not
right at least in theory, and task->uprobe_srcu_id blows task_struct.
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 -
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 22 +++-------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 8379e37..90a1f1d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1592,7 +1592,6 @@ struct task_struct {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
struct uprobe_task *utask;
- int uprobe_srcu_id;
#endif
};
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index ed76ee5..221e670 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
#define UINSNS_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE/UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES)
#define MAX_UPROBE_XOL_SLOTS UINSNS_PER_PAGE
-static struct srcu_struct uprobes_srcu;
static struct rb_root uprobes_tree = RB_ROOT;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(uprobes_treelock); /* serialize rbtree access */
@@ -723,20 +722,14 @@ remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, loff_t vaddr)
}
/*
- * There could be threads that have hit the breakpoint and are entering the
- * notifier code and trying to acquire the uprobes_treelock. The thread
- * calling delete_uprobe() that is removing the uprobe from the rb_tree can
- * race with these threads and might acquire the uprobes_treelock compared
- * to some of the breakpoint hit threads. In such a case, the breakpoint
- * hit threads will not find the uprobe. The current unregistering thread
- * waits till all other threads have hit a breakpoint, to acquire the
- * uprobes_treelock before the uprobe is removed from the rbtree.
+ * There could be threads that have already hit the breakpoint. They
+ * will recheck the current insn and restart if find_uprobe() fails.
+ * See find_active_uprobe().
*/
static void delete_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
{
unsigned long flags;
- synchronize_srcu(&uprobes_srcu);
spin_lock_irqsave(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
rb_erase(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
@@ -1373,9 +1366,6 @@ void uprobe_free_utask(struct task_struct *t)
{
struct uprobe_task *utask = t->utask;
- if (t->uprobe_srcu_id != -1)
- srcu_read_unlock_raw(&uprobes_srcu, t->uprobe_srcu_id);
-
if (!utask)
return;
@@ -1393,7 +1383,6 @@ void uprobe_free_utask(struct task_struct *t)
void uprobe_copy_process(struct task_struct *t)
{
t->utask = NULL;
- t->uprobe_srcu_id = -1;
}
/*
@@ -1521,9 +1510,6 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp)
} else {
*is_swbp = -EFAULT;
}
-
- srcu_read_unlock_raw(&uprobes_srcu, current->uprobe_srcu_id);
- current->uprobe_srcu_id = -1;
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
return uprobe;
@@ -1664,7 +1650,6 @@ int uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
utask->state = UTASK_BP_HIT;
set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
- current->uprobe_srcu_id = srcu_read_lock_raw(&uprobes_srcu);
return 1;
}
@@ -1699,7 +1684,6 @@ static int __init init_uprobes(void)
mutex_init(&uprobes_mutex[i]);
mutex_init(&uprobes_mmap_mutex[i]);
}
- init_srcu_struct(&uprobes_srcu);
return register_die_notifier(&uprobe_exception_nb);
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-05 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-05 22:20 [RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] uprobes: introduce find_active_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] uprobes: introduce is_swbp_at_addr_fast() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 14:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-17 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 19:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-05 22:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] uprobes: teach find_active_uprobe() to provide the "is_swbp" info Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] uprobes: change register_for_each_vma() to take mm->mmap_sem for writing Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] uprobes: teach handle_swbp() to rely on "is_swbp" rather than uprobes_srcu Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:22 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-04-14 11:16 ` [RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Ingo Molnar
2012-04-16 11:31 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-16 14:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 12:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-25 14:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 13:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-14 20:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 19:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 21:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 23:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 21:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-20 10:16 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-20 18:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 7:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-23 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 17:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 20:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 21:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120405222221.GF19166@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).