linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: vmscan: fix misused nr_reclaimed in shrink_mem_cgroup_zone()"
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:50:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120409125055.c6f6fdf0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334000524-23972-1-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>

On Mon,  9 Apr 2012 12:42:04 -0700
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> wrote:

> This reverts commit c38446cc65e1f2b3eb8630c53943b94c4f65f670.
> 
> Before the commit, the code makes senses to me but not after the commit. The
> "nr_reclaimed" is the number of pages reclaimed by scanning through the memcg's
> lru lists. The "nr_to_reclaim" is the target value for the whole function. For
> example, we like to early break the reclaim if reclaimed 32 pages under direct
> reclaim (not DEF_PRIORITY).
> 
> After the reverted commit, the target "nr_to_reclaim" is decremented each time
> by "nr_reclaimed" but we still use it to compare the "nr_reclaimed". It just
> doesn't make sense to me...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c |    7 +------
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 33c332b..1a51868 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2107,12 +2107,7 @@ restart:
>  		 * with multiple processes reclaiming pages, the total
>  		 * freeing target can get unreasonably large.
>  		 */
> -		if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim)
> -			nr_to_reclaim = 0;
> -		else
> -			nr_to_reclaim -= nr_reclaimed;
> -
> -		if (!nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
> +		if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
>  			break;
>  	}
>  	blk_finish_plug(&plug);

This code is all within a loop: the "goto restart" thing.  We reset
nr_reclaimed to zero each time around that loop.  nr_to_reclaim is (or
rather, was) constant throughout the entire function.

Comparing nr_reclaimed (whcih is reset each time around the loop) to
nr_to_reclaim made no sense.

I think the code as it stands is ugly.  It would be better to make
nr_to_reclaim a const and to add another local total_reclaimed, and
compare that with nr_to_reclaim.  Or just stop resetting nr_reclaimed
each time around the loop.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-09 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-09 19:42 [PATCH] Revert "mm: vmscan: fix misused nr_reclaimed in shrink_mem_cgroup_zone()" Ying Han
2012-04-09 19:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-04-09 21:23   ` Ying Han
2012-04-09 22:29     ` Ying Han
2012-04-09 23:24   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-10  0:04     ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-10 15:00 ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-10 15:16   ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-10 16:44   ` Ying Han
2012-04-11 11:55     ` Hillf Danton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120409125055.c6f6fdf0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).