From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] thp, memcg: split hugepage for memcg oom on cow
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:20:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120411142023.GB1789@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204092242050.27689@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:42:31PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On COW, a new hugepage is allocated and charged to the memcg. If the
> system is oom or the charge to the memcg fails, however, the fault
> handler will return VM_FAULT_OOM which results in an oom kill.
>
> Instead, it's possible to fallback to splitting the hugepage so that the
> COW results only in an order-0 page being allocated and charged to the
> memcg which has a higher liklihood to succeed. This is expensive because
> the hugepage must be split in the page fault handler, but it is much
> better than unnecessarily oom killing a process.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 3 +++
> mm/memory.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -950,6 +950,8 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_FALLBACK);
> ret = do_huge_pmd_wp_page_fallback(mm, vma, address,
> pmd, orig_pmd, page, haddr);
> + if (ret & VM_FAULT_OOM)
> + split_huge_page(page);
> put_page(page);
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -957,6 +959,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
> if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(new_page, mm, GFP_KERNEL))) {
> put_page(new_page);
> + split_huge_page(page);
> put_page(page);
> ret |= VM_FAULT_OOM;
> goto out;
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3489,6 +3489,7 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
> return hugetlb_fault(mm, vma, address, flags);
>
> +retry:
> pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
> pud = pud_alloc(mm, pgd, address);
> if (!pud)
> @@ -3502,13 +3503,24 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pmd, flags);
> } else {
> pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmd;
> + int ret;
> +
> barrier();
> if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)) {
> if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE &&
> !pmd_write(orig_pmd) &&
> - !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd))
> - return do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address,
> - pmd, orig_pmd);
> + !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd)) {
> + ret = do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address, pmd,
> + orig_pmd);
> + /*
> + * If COW results in an oom, the huge pmd will
> + * have been split, so retry the fault on the
> + * pte for a smaller charge.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(ret & VM_FAULT_OOM))
> + goto retry;
Can you instead put a __split_huge_page_pmd(mm, pmd) here? It has to
redo the get-page-ref-through-pagetable dance, but it's more robust
and obvious than splitting the COW page before returning OOM in the
thp wp handler.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-04 1:56 [patch] thp, memcg: split hugepage for memcg oom on cow David Rientjes
2012-04-09 9:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10 0:23 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10 0:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10 0:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10 5:41 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10 5:42 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2012-04-10 5:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-11 14:20 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2012-04-23 23:15 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-25 21:01 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-26 9:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-26 21:05 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-27 0:15 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120411142023.GB1789@redhat.com \
--to=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).