From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] perf/probe: Provide perf interface for uprobes
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:07:51 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120412140751.GM16257@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F864BB3.3090405@hitachi.com>
Em Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:27:47PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> [2012-04-11 11:49:18]:
> > Yeah, if one needs to disambiguate, sure, use these keywords, but for
> > things like:
> >
> > $ perf probe /lib/libc.so.6 malloc
> >
> > I think it is easy to figure out it is userspace. I.e. some regex would
> > figure it out.
>
> That's interessting to me too. Maybe it is also useful syntax for
> module specifying too.
>
> e.g.
> perf probe -m kvm kvm_timer_fn
>
> can be
>
> perf probe kvm.ko kvm_timer_fn
>
> (.ko is required) or if unloaded
>
> perf probe /lib/modules/XXX/kernel/virt/kvm.ko kvm_timer_fn
It may not even be required, since we can check in /proc/modules
if "kvm" is there and as well if it has a function named "kvm_timer_fn".
Also probably there is no library or binary on the current
directory with such a name :-)
Likewise, if we do:
$ perf probe libc-2.12.so malloc
It should just figure out it is the /lib64/libc-2.12.so
Heck, even:
$ perf probe libc malloc
Makes it even easier to use.
Its just when one asks for something that has ambiguities that
the tool should ask the user to be a bit more precise to remove such
ambiguity.
After all...
[acme@sandy linux]$ locate libc-2.12.so
/home/acme/.debug/lib64/libc-2.12.so
/home/acme/.debug/lib64/libc-2.12.so/293f8b6f5e6cea240d1bb0b47ec269ee91f31673
/home/acme/.debug/lib64/libc-2.12.so/5a7fad9dfcbb67af098a258bc2a20137cc954424
/lib64/libc-2.12.so
/usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.12.so.debug
[acme@sandy linux]$
Only /lib64/libc-2.12.so is on the ld library path :-)
And after people really start depending on this tool for day to
day use, they may do like me:
[root@sandy ~]# alias probe="perf probe"
[root@sandy ~]# probe -F | grep skb_queue
skb_queue_head
skb_queue_purge
skb_queue_tail
[root@sandy ~]#
Which gets it to the shortest possible form:
$ probe libc malloc
:-)
Git has this nice feature that is on the same line of making
things easier for the user:
[acme@sandy linux]$ git fack
git: 'fack' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
Did you mean this?
fsck
[acme@sandy linux]$
Hell, yes, fsck is what I meant! :-)
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-12 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 13:57 [PATCH] perf/probe: Provide perf interface for uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-11 14:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-11 17:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-11 18:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-12 3:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-04-12 14:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2012-04-12 14:41 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-12 15:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-12 15:10 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-13 6:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-04-14 1:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-16 12:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120412140751.GM16257@infradead.org \
--to=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).