From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx142.postini.com [74.125.245.142]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 537316B004D for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:39:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from /spool/local by e34.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:39:34 -0600 Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA6B19D804E for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:39:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q3GBdScI183056 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:39:28 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q3GBdPUR031755 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:39:26 -0600 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:01:24 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Message-ID: <20120416113124.GA25464@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20120405222024.GA19154@redhat.com> <20120414111637.GB24688@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120414111637.GB24688@gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Jim Keniston , LKML , Linux-mm , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , Steven Rostedt , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Masami Hiramatsu , Thomas Gleixner , Anton Arapov * Ingo Molnar [2012-04-14 13:16:37]: > > * Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > Not for inclusion yet, only for the early review. > > Srikar, any objection to these? They look like fine changes to > me in principle, making uprobes less of an overhead to other > kernel subsystems. > I dont have any objections to Oleg's changes. However as Oleg has said, they are currently untested. Once the tracing and perf bits are in -tip, I will add these bits and test them and let you know. Given that I have tested the current bits in -tip several times, I think it might be worthwhile to keep these changes on hold till the current uprobe bits in -tip go upstream. Oleg: Would this be acceptable? -- Thanks and Regards Srikar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org