From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux-S390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] s390: mm: rmap: Transfer storage key to struct page under the page lock
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:28:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120418152831.GK2359@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1204172023390.1609@eggly.anvils>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 08:52:21PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > (You do remind me that I meant years ago to switch swapper_space over
> > > to the much simpler __set_page_dirty_no_writeback(), which shmem has
> > > used for ages; but as far as this problem goes, that would probably
> > > be at best a workaround, rather than the proper fix.)
> >
> > It would be a workaround. If in the future we wanted to treat swapper
> > space more like a normal file inode and writeback dirty pages from
> > the flusher thread then this bug would just pop its head back up.
>
> It's a no-brainer workaround: patch and more explanation below. I
> can double-fix it if you prefer, but the one-liner appeals more to me.
>
Ok, fair enough. While I think swapper space will eventually use the dirty
tag information that day is not today.
> > > Hmm, mm/migrate.c.
> >
> > Migration moves the page mapping under the tree lock so
> > __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() I don't think that is it.
>
> Yes, I was worried by the places that set page->mapping = NULL in
> migrate.c (later, not under the tree_lock), but those would not be able
> to generate this issue at all (ptes already replaced by migration entries).
>
Yes.
> <SNIP>
>
> [PATCH] mm: fix s390 BUG by using __set_page_dirty_no_writeback on swap
>
> Mel reports a BUG_ON(slot == NULL) in radix_tree_tag_set() on s390 3.0.13:
> called from __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() when page_remove_rmap() tries to
> transfer dirty flag from s390 storage key to struct page and radix_tree.
>
> That would be because of reclaim's shrink_page_list() calling add_to_swap()
> on this page at the same time: first PageSwapCache is set (causing
> page_mapping(page) to appear as &swapper_space), then page->private set,
> then tree_lock taken, then page inserted into radix_tree - so there's
> an interval before taking the lock when the radix_tree slot is empty.
>
Yes, makes sense.
> We could fix this by moving __add_to_swap_cache()'s spin_lock_irq up
> before SetPageSwapCache, with error case ClearPageSwapCache moved up
> under tree_lock too.
>
This can be done if/when swapper_space can make proper use of the dirty
tag information.
> But a better fix is just to do what's five years overdue. Ken Chen
> added __set_page_dirty_no_writeback() (if !PageDirty TestSetPageDirty)
> for tmpfs to skip all that radix_tree overhead, and swap is just the same:
> it ignores the radix_tree tag, and does not participate in dirty page
> accounting, so should be using __set_page_dirty_no_writeback() too.
>
> Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
I've sent a kernel based on this patch to the s390 folk that originally
reported the bug. Hopefully they'll test and get back to me in a few
days.
Thanks Hugh.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 14:14 [RFC PATCH] s390: mm: rmap: Transfer storage key to struct page under the page lock Mel Gorman
2012-04-16 14:53 ` Rik van Riel
2012-04-16 15:02 ` Mel Gorman
2012-04-16 15:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-17 12:29 ` Mel Gorman
2012-04-17 13:02 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-18 4:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-16 21:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-17 12:22 ` Mel Gorman
2012-04-18 3:52 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-18 15:28 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-04-18 17:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-23 12:41 ` Mel Gorman
2012-04-23 18:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-23 18:14 ` [PATCH] mm: fix s390 BUG by __set_page_dirty_no_writeback on swap Hugh Dickins
2012-04-18 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH] s390: mm: rmap: Transfer storage key to struct page under the page lock Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120418152831.GK2359@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).