From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] memcg: add mlock statistic in memory.stat
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:33:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120418163330.ca1518c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334773315-32215-1-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:21:55 -0700
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> wrote:
> We have the nr_mlock stat both in meminfo as well as vmstat system wide, this
> patch adds the mlock field into per-memcg memory stat. The stat itself enhances
> the metrics exported by memcg since the unevictable lru includes more than
> mlock()'d page like SHM_LOCK'd.
>
> Why we need to count mlock'd pages while they are unevictable and we can not
> do much on them anyway?
>
> This is true. The mlock stat I am proposing is more helpful for system admin
> and kernel developer to understand the system workload. The same information
> should be helpful to add into OOM log as well. Many times in the past that we
> need to read the mlock stat from the per-container meminfo for different
> reason. Afterall, we do have the ability to read the mlock from meminfo and
> this patch fills the info in memcg.
>
>
> ...
>
> static inline int is_mlocked_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page)
> {
> + bool locked;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
>
> if (likely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED))
> return 0;
>
> + mem_cgroup_begin_update_page_stat(page, &locked, &flags);
> if (!TestSetPageMlocked(page)) {
> inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_MLOCK);
> + mem_cgroup_inc_page_stat(page, MEMCG_NR_MLOCK);
> count_vm_event(UNEVICTABLE_PGMLOCKED);
> }
> + mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(page, &locked, &flags);
> +
> return 1;
> }
Unrelated to this patch: is_mlocked_vma() is misnamed. A function with
that name should be a bool-returning test which has no side-effects.
>
> ...
>
> static void __free_pages_ok(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> - int wasMlocked = __TestClearPageMlocked(page);
> + bool locked;
>
> if (!free_pages_prepare(page, order))
> return;
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> - if (unlikely(wasMlocked))
> + mem_cgroup_begin_update_page_stat(page, &locked, &flags);
hm, what's going on here. The page now has a zero refcount and is to
be returned to the buddy. But mem_cgroup_begin_update_page_stat()
assumes that the page still belongs to a memcg. I'd have thought that
any page_cgroup backreferences would have been torn down by now?
> + if (unlikely(__TestClearPageMlocked(page)))
> free_page_mlock(page);
And if the page _is_ still accessible via cgroup lookup, the use of the
nonatomic RMW is dangerous.
> __count_vm_events(PGFREE, 1 << order);
> free_one_page(page_zone(page), page, order,
> get_pageblock_migratetype(page));
> + mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(page, &locked, &flags);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> @@ -1250,7 +1256,7 @@ void free_hot_cold_page(struct page *page, int cold)
The same comments apply in free_hot_cold_page().
> struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
> unsigned long flags;
> int migratetype;
> - int wasMlocked = __TestClearPageMlocked(page);
> + bool locked;
>
> if (!free_pages_prepare(page, 0))
> return;
>
> ...
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-18 18:21 [PATCH V2] memcg: add mlock statistic in memory.stat Ying Han
2012-04-18 23:33 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-04-19 0:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-19 13:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-19 22:46 ` Ying Han
2012-04-19 23:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-20 0:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-20 5:57 ` Ying Han
2012-04-20 6:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-20 6:39 ` Ying Han
2012-04-20 6:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-19 22:43 ` Ying Han
2012-04-19 22:30 ` Ying Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120418163330.ca1518c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).