linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: don't call mmu_shrinker w/o used_mmu_pages
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:11:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420151143.433c514e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334356721-9009-1-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>

On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:38:41 -0700
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> wrote:

> The mmu_shrink() is heavy by itself by iterating all kvms and holding
> the kvm_lock. spotted the code w/ Rik during LSF, and it turns out we
> don't need to call the shrinker if nothing to shrink.
> 

We should probably tell the kvm maintainers about this ;)

> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,11 @@ static u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmio_mask;
>  
>  static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 spte);
>  
> +static inline int get_kvm_total_used_mmu_pages()
> +{
> +	return percpu_counter_read_positive(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages);
> +}
> +
>  void kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask(u64 mmio_mask)
>  {
>  	shadow_mmio_mask = mmio_mask;
> @@ -3900,6 +3905,9 @@ static int mmu_shrink(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>  	if (nr_to_scan == 0)
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	if (!get_kvm_total_used_mmu_pages())
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	raw_spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
> @@ -3926,7 +3934,7 @@ static int mmu_shrink(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
>  
>  out:
> -	return percpu_counter_read_positive(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages);
> +	return get_kvm_total_used_mmu_pages();
>  }
>  
>  static struct shrinker mmu_shrinker = {

There's a small functional change: percpu_counter_read_positive() is an
approximate thing, so there will be cases where there will be some
pages which are accounted for only in the percpu_counter's per-cpu
accumulators.  In that case mmu_shrink() will bale out when there are
in fact some freeable pages available.  This is hopefully unimportant.

Do we actually know that this patch helps anything?  Any measurements? Is
kvm_total_used_mmu_pages==0 at all common?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-20 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13 22:38 [PATCH] kvm: don't call mmu_shrinker w/o used_mmu_pages Ying Han
2012-04-14 11:44 ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-16 16:43   ` Ying Han
2012-04-20 22:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-04-20 22:53   ` Rik van Riel
2012-04-20 23:07     ` Ying Han
2012-04-21  1:56       ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21  2:15         ` Mike Waychison
2012-04-21  2:29           ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21  2:48             ` Mike Waychison
2012-04-22  9:16           ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-22 19:05             ` Eric Northup
2012-04-23  8:37               ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-22  9:04   ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-22  9:35   ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-23 16:40     ` Ying Han
2012-04-23 16:48       ` Rik van Riel
2012-04-23 16:57         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120420151143.433c514e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).