From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx182.postini.com [74.125.245.182]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CDCF6B0044 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:10:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:10:11 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/1] Flexible proportions Message-ID: <20120425021011.GA5600@localhost> References: <1335285033-7347-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1335285033-7347-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Jan Kara Cc: LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Zijlstra Hi Jan, > So my plan, if people are happy with the new proportion code, would be to > switch at least bdi writeout proportion to the new code. I can also check > other users to see whether it would make sense for them to switch. So what > do people think? When you get ready with the full patchset, I would be very interested in watching how it performs in the various JBOD tests :-) Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org