* [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all
@ 2012-05-11 2:08 majianpeng
2012-05-11 16:14 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: majianpeng @ 2012-05-11 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: slub-maintainer, gilad; +Cc: linux-mm
Subject: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all
Find some kernel message like:
SLUB raid5-md127: kmem_cache_destroy called for cache that still has objects.
Pid: 6143, comm: mdadm Tainted: G O 3.4.0-rc6+ #75
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff811227f8>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x328/0x400
[<ffffffffa005ff1d>] free_conf+0x2d/0xf0 [raid456]
[<ffffffffa0060791>] stop+0x41/0x60 [raid456]
[<ffffffffa000276a>] md_stop+0x1a/0x60 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa000c974>] do_md_stop+0x74/0x470 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa000d0ff>] md_ioctl+0xff/0x11f0 [md_mod]
[<ffffffff8127c958>] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0
[<ffffffff8115ef6b>] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40
[<ffffffff8113b9c6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560
[<ffffffff8113bf21>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0
[<ffffffff816e9d22>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Then using kmemleak can found those messages:
unreferenced object 0xffff8800b6db7380 (size 112):
comm "mdadm", pid 5783, jiffies 4294810749 (age 90.589s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 01 db b6 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff .....N..........
ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 98 40 4a 82 ff ff ff ff .........@J.....
backtrace:
[<ffffffff816b52c1>] kmemleak_alloc+0x21/0x50
[<ffffffff8111a11b>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xeb/0x1b0
[<ffffffff8111c431>] kmem_cache_open+0x2f1/0x430
[<ffffffff8111c6c8>] kmem_cache_create+0x158/0x320
[<ffffffffa008f979>] setup_conf+0x649/0x770 [raid456]
[<ffffffffa009044b>] run+0x68b/0x840 [raid456]
[<ffffffffa000bde9>] md_run+0x529/0x940 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa000c218>] do_md_run+0x18/0xc0 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa000dba8>] md_ioctl+0xba8/0x11f0 [md_mod]
[<ffffffff81272b28>] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0
[<ffffffff81155bfb>] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40
[<ffffffff811326d6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560
[<ffffffff81132c31>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0
[<ffffffff816dd3a2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
This bug introduced by Commit a8364d5555b2030d093cde0f0795.The
commit did not include checks for per cpu partial pages being present on a
cpu.
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index ffe13fd..6fce08f 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ static bool has_cpu_slab(int cpu, void *info)
struct kmem_cache *s = info;
struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu);
- return !!(c->page);
+ return c->page || c->partial;
}
static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s)
--
1.7.5.4
Thanks all.
majianpeng
2012-05-09
--------------
majianpeng
2012-05-11
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all 2012-05-11 2:08 [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all majianpeng @ 2012-05-11 16:14 ` Christoph Lameter 2012-05-13 6:53 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef 2012-05-14 1:09 ` majianpeng 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2012-05-11 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: majianpeng; +Cc: gilad, linux-mm, Pekka Enberg Didn't I already ack this before? Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> On Fri, 11 May 2012, majianpeng wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all > > Find some kernel message like: > SLUB raid5-md127: kmem_cache_destroy called for cache that still has objects. > Pid: 6143, comm: mdadm Tainted: G O 3.4.0-rc6+ #75 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff811227f8>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x328/0x400 > [<ffffffffa005ff1d>] free_conf+0x2d/0xf0 [raid456] > [<ffffffffa0060791>] stop+0x41/0x60 [raid456] > [<ffffffffa000276a>] md_stop+0x1a/0x60 [md_mod] > [<ffffffffa000c974>] do_md_stop+0x74/0x470 [md_mod] > [<ffffffffa000d0ff>] md_ioctl+0xff/0x11f0 [md_mod] > [<ffffffff8127c958>] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0 > [<ffffffff8115ef6b>] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40 > [<ffffffff8113b9c6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560 > [<ffffffff8113bf21>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0 > [<ffffffff816e9d22>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > > Then using kmemleak can found those messages: > unreferenced object 0xffff8800b6db7380 (size 112): > comm "mdadm", pid 5783, jiffies 4294810749 (age 90.589s) > hex dump (first 32 bytes): > 01 01 db b6 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff .....N.......... > ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 98 40 4a 82 ff ff ff ff .........@J..... > backtrace: > [<ffffffff816b52c1>] kmemleak_alloc+0x21/0x50 > [<ffffffff8111a11b>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xeb/0x1b0 > [<ffffffff8111c431>] kmem_cache_open+0x2f1/0x430 > [<ffffffff8111c6c8>] kmem_cache_create+0x158/0x320 > [<ffffffffa008f979>] setup_conf+0x649/0x770 [raid456] > [<ffffffffa009044b>] run+0x68b/0x840 [raid456] > [<ffffffffa000bde9>] md_run+0x529/0x940 [md_mod] > [<ffffffffa000c218>] do_md_run+0x18/0xc0 [md_mod] > [<ffffffffa000dba8>] md_ioctl+0xba8/0x11f0 [md_mod] > [<ffffffff81272b28>] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0 > [<ffffffff81155bfb>] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40 > [<ffffffff811326d6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560 > [<ffffffff81132c31>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0 > [<ffffffff816dd3a2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff > > This bug introduced by Commit a8364d5555b2030d093cde0f0795.The > commit did not include checks for per cpu partial pages being present on a > cpu. > > Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> > --- > mm/slub.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > index ffe13fd..6fce08f 100644 > --- a/mm/slub.c > +++ b/mm/slub.c > @@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ static bool has_cpu_slab(int cpu, void *info) > struct kmem_cache *s = info; > struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu); > > - return !!(c->page); > + return c->page || c->partial; > } > > static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s) > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all 2012-05-11 16:14 ` Christoph Lameter @ 2012-05-13 6:53 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef 2012-05-16 11:05 ` Jeff Layton 2012-05-14 1:09 ` majianpeng 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Gilad Ben-Yossef @ 2012-05-13 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: majianpeng, linux-mm, Pekka Enberg, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote: > Didn't I already ack this before? > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> > Yes, you did, but the patch description and title was lacking and Majianpeng kindly fixed it, hence the re-send, I guess. I've added Andrew, since he took my original commit that introduces the bug that this patch by Majianpeng fixes (and also LKML). This fix really needs to get into 3.4, otherwise we'll be breaking slub. What's the best way to go about that? Thanks! Gilad > On Fri, 11 May 2012, majianpeng wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all >> >> Find some kernel message like: >> SLUB raid5-md127: kmem_cache_destroy called for cache that still has objects. >> Pid: 6143, comm: mdadm Tainted: G O 3.4.0-rc6+ #75 >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff811227f8>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x328/0x400 >> [<ffffffffa005ff1d>] free_conf+0x2d/0xf0 [raid456] >> [<ffffffffa0060791>] stop+0x41/0x60 [raid456] >> [<ffffffffa000276a>] md_stop+0x1a/0x60 [md_mod] >> [<ffffffffa000c974>] do_md_stop+0x74/0x470 [md_mod] >> [<ffffffffa000d0ff>] md_ioctl+0xff/0x11f0 [md_mod] >> [<ffffffff8127c958>] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0 >> [<ffffffff8115ef6b>] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40 >> [<ffffffff8113b9c6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560 >> [<ffffffff8113bf21>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0 >> [<ffffffff816e9d22>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >> >> Then using kmemleak can found those messages: >> unreferenced object 0xffff8800b6db7380 (size 112): >> comm "mdadm", pid 5783, jiffies 4294810749 (age 90.589s) >> hex dump (first 32 bytes): >> 01 01 db b6 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff .....N.......... >> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 98 40 4a 82 ff ff ff ff .........@J..... >> backtrace: >> [<ffffffff816b52c1>] kmemleak_alloc+0x21/0x50 >> [<ffffffff8111a11b>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xeb/0x1b0 >> [<ffffffff8111c431>] kmem_cache_open+0x2f1/0x430 >> [<ffffffff8111c6c8>] kmem_cache_create+0x158/0x320 >> [<ffffffffa008f979>] setup_conf+0x649/0x770 [raid456] >> [<ffffffffa009044b>] run+0x68b/0x840 [raid456] >> [<ffffffffa000bde9>] md_run+0x529/0x940 [md_mod] >> [<ffffffffa000c218>] do_md_run+0x18/0xc0 [md_mod] >> [<ffffffffa000dba8>] md_ioctl+0xba8/0x11f0 [md_mod] >> [<ffffffff81272b28>] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0 >> [<ffffffff81155bfb>] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40 >> [<ffffffff811326d6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560 >> [<ffffffff81132c31>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0 >> [<ffffffff816dd3a2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff >> >> This bug introduced by Commit a8364d5555b2030d093cde0f0795.The >> commit did not include checks for per cpu partial pages being present on a >> cpu. >> >> Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> >> --- >> mm/slub.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c >> index ffe13fd..6fce08f 100644 >> --- a/mm/slub.c >> +++ b/mm/slub.c >> @@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ static bool has_cpu_slab(int cpu, void *info) >> struct kmem_cache *s = info; >> struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu); >> >> - return !!(c->page); >> + return c->page || c->partial; >> } >> >> static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s) >> -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker gilad@benyossef.com Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388 US Cell: +1-973-8260388 http://benyossef.com "If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a situation where the homework eats your dog?" -- Jean-Baptiste Queru -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all 2012-05-13 6:53 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef @ 2012-05-16 11:05 ` Jeff Layton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jeff Layton @ 2012-05-16 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilad Ben-Yossef Cc: Christoph Lameter, majianpeng, linux-mm, Pekka Enberg, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton On Sun, 13 May 2012 09:53:15 +0300 Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote: > > Didn't I already ack this before? > > > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> > > > > Yes, you did, but the patch description and title was lacking and > Majianpeng kindly fixed it, hence the re-send, I guess. > > I've added Andrew, since he took my original commit that introduces > the bug that this patch by Majianpeng fixes (and also LKML). > > This fix really needs to get into 3.4, otherwise we'll be breaking > slub. What's the best way to go about that? > > Thanks! > Gilad > > > On Fri, 11 May 2012, majianpeng wrote: > > > >> Subject: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all > >> > >> Find some kernel message like: > >> SLUB raid5-md127: kmem_cache_destroy called for cache that still has objects. > >> Pid: 6143, comm: mdadm Tainted: G O 3.4.0-rc6+ #75 > >> Call Trace: > >> [<ffffffff811227f8>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x328/0x400 > >> [<ffffffffa005ff1d>] free_conf+0x2d/0xf0 [raid456] > >> [<ffffffffa0060791>] stop+0x41/0x60 [raid456] > >> [<ffffffffa000276a>] md_stop+0x1a/0x60 [md_mod] > >> [<ffffffffa000c974>] do_md_stop+0x74/0x470 [md_mod] > >> [<ffffffffa000d0ff>] md_ioctl+0xff/0x11f0 [md_mod] > >> [<ffffffff8127c958>] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0 > >> [<ffffffff8115ef6b>] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40 > >> [<ffffffff8113b9c6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560 > >> [<ffffffff8113bf21>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0 > >> [<ffffffff816e9d22>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > >> > >> Then using kmemleak can found those messages: > >> unreferenced object 0xffff8800b6db7380 (size 112): > >> comm "mdadm", pid 5783, jiffies 4294810749 (age 90.589s) > >> hex dump (first 32 bytes): > >> 01 01 db b6 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff .....N.......... > >> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 98 40 4a 82 ff ff ff ff .........@J..... > >> backtrace: > >> [<ffffffff816b52c1>] kmemleak_alloc+0x21/0x50 > >> [<ffffffff8111a11b>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xeb/0x1b0 > >> [<ffffffff8111c431>] kmem_cache_open+0x2f1/0x430 > >> [<ffffffff8111c6c8>] kmem_cache_create+0x158/0x320 > >> [<ffffffffa008f979>] setup_conf+0x649/0x770 [raid456] > >> [<ffffffffa009044b>] run+0x68b/0x840 [raid456] > >> [<ffffffffa000bde9>] md_run+0x529/0x940 [md_mod] > >> [<ffffffffa000c218>] do_md_run+0x18/0xc0 [md_mod] > >> [<ffffffffa000dba8>] md_ioctl+0xba8/0x11f0 [md_mod] > >> [<ffffffff81272b28>] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0 > >> [<ffffffff81155bfb>] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40 > >> [<ffffffff811326d6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560 > >> [<ffffffff81132c31>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0 > >> [<ffffffff816dd3a2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > >> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff > >> > >> This bug introduced by Commit a8364d5555b2030d093cde0f0795.The > >> commit did not include checks for per cpu partial pages being present on a > >> cpu. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> mm/slub.c | 2 +- > >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > >> index ffe13fd..6fce08f 100644 > >> --- a/mm/slub.c > >> +++ b/mm/slub.c > >> @@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ static bool has_cpu_slab(int cpu, void *info) > >> struct kmem_cache *s = info; > >> struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu); > >> > >> - return !!(c->page); > >> + return c->page || c->partial; > >> } > >> > >> static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s) > >> > > > FWIW, this patch fixed a similar warning that I was seeing on module unload with cifs.ko. I agree it would be good to get it in for 3.4... Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all 2012-05-11 16:14 ` Christoph Lameter 2012-05-13 6:53 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef @ 2012-05-14 1:09 ` majianpeng 2012-05-14 13:45 ` Christoph Lameter 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: majianpeng @ 2012-05-14 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilad Ben-Yossef, Christoph Lameter Cc: linux-mm, Pekka Enberg, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote: > Didn't I already ack this before? > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> > >Yes, you did, but the patch description and title was lacking and >Majianpeng kindly fixed it, hence the re-send, I guess. >I've added Andrew, since he took my original commit that introduces >the bug that this patch by Majianpeng fixes (and also LKML). >This fix really needs to get into 3.4, otherwise we'll be breaking >slub. What's the best way to go about that? >Thanks! >Gilad Sorry for late to relay. I rewrited the comment and resend. I have a question to ask:because the patch fixed by others,for example Christoph Lameter, Gilad. Should I add sogine-off by them in the patch? Thanks all! ------------------ majianpeng 2012-05-14 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all 2012-05-14 1:09 ` majianpeng @ 2012-05-14 13:45 ` Christoph Lameter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2012-05-14 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: majianpeng Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef, linux-mm, Pekka Enberg, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton On Mon, 14 May 2012, majianpeng wrote: > Sorry for late to relay. I rewrited the comment and resend. > I have a question to ask:because the patch fixed by others,for example Christoph Lameter, Gilad. > Should I add sogine-off by them in the patch? I 6hink its fine the way it is. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-16 11:05 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-05-11 2:08 [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all majianpeng 2012-05-11 16:14 ` Christoph Lameter 2012-05-13 6:53 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef 2012-05-16 11:05 ` Jeff Layton 2012-05-14 1:09 ` majianpeng 2012-05-14 13:45 ` Christoph Lameter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).