Re: [PATCH] mm/page-writeback.c: fix comments error in page-writeback.c

[Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>]

On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 07:45:33PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  mm/page-writeback.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 93d8d2f..c833bf0 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static void bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  	 */
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * dirty_ratelimit will follow balanced_dirty_ratelimit iff
> +	 * dirty_ratelimit will follow balanced_dirty_ratelimit if

That 'iff' means 'if and only if'.

>  	 * task_ratelimit is on the same side of dirty_ratelimit, too.
>  	 * For example, when
>  	 * - dirty_ratelimit > balanced_dirty_ratelimit
> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ static void bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  	 * feel and care are stable dirty rate and small position error.
>  	 *
>  	 * |task_ratelimit - dirty_ratelimit| is used to limit the step size
> -	 * and filter out the sigular points of balanced_dirty_ratelimit. Which
> +	 * and filter out the singular points of balanced_dirty_ratelimit. Which
>  	 * keeps jumping around randomly and can even leap far away at times
>  	 * due to the small 200ms estimation period of dirty_rate (we want to
>  	 * keep that period small to reduce time lags).

I'll fold the above chunk into the previous patch.

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>