From: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
PeterZijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page-writeback.c: fix update bandwidth time judgment error
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:54:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120610045300.GA29336@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120610043641.GA10355@localhost>
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:36:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>Wanpeng,
>
>Sorry this I won't take this: it don't really improve anything. Even
>with the changed test, the real intervals are still some random values
>above (and not far away from) 200ms.. We are saying about 200ms
>intervals just for convenience.
>
But some parts like:
__bdi_update_bandwidth which bdi_update_bandwidth will call:
if(elapsed < BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)
return;
or
global_update_bandwidth:
if(time_before(now, update_time + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
return;
You me just ignore this disunion ?
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>
>On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:20:05PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpneg Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Since bdi_update_bandwidth function should estimate write bandwidth at 200ms intervals,
>> so the time is bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL == jiffies, but
>> if use time_is_after_eq_jiffies intervals will be bdi->bw_time_stamp +
>> BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL + 1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
>> index c833bf0..099e225 100644
>> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
>> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
>> @@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static void bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>> unsigned long bdi_dirty,
>> unsigned long start_time)
>> {
>> - if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
>> + if (time_is_after_jiffies(bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
>> return;
>> spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
>> __bdi_update_bandwidth(bdi, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-10 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-10 4:20 [PATCH] page-writeback.c: fix update bandwidth time judgment error Wanpeng Li
2012-06-10 4:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-10 4:54 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2012-06-10 7:24 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-10 7:41 ` Wanpeng Li
2012-06-10 7:47 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120610045300.GA29336@kernel \
--to=liwp.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).