linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02.5] mm: sl[au]b: first remove PFMEMALLOC flag then SLAB flag
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:38:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120620073805.GD8810@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120615155432.GA5498@breakpoint.cc>

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:54:32PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> 
> If we first remove the SLAB flag followed by the PFMEMALLOC flag then the
> removal of the latter will trigger the VM_BUG_ON() as it can be seen in
> | kernel BUG at include/linux/page-flags.h:474!
> | invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> | Call Trace:
> |  [<c10e2d77>] slab_destroy+0x27/0x70
> |  [<c10e3285>] drain_freelist+0x55/0x90
> |  [<c10e344e>] __cache_shrink+0x6e/0x90
> |  [<c14e3211>] ? acpi_sleep_init+0xcf/0xcf
> |  [<c10e349d>] kmem_cache_shrink+0x2d/0x40
> 
> because the SLAB flag is gone. This patch simply changes the order.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Grr, yes of course. Thanks very much. I've folded this into patch 2 and
preserved credit.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-20  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-17 14:50 [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V11 Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm: Serialize access to min_free_kbytes Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm: sl[au]b: Add knowledge of PFMEMALLOC reserve pages Mel Gorman
2012-06-15 15:54   ` [PATCH 02.5] mm: sl[au]b: first remove PFMEMALLOC flag then SLAB flag Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-06-16  8:14     ` Cong Wang
2012-06-20  7:38     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/17] mm: slub: Optimise the SLUB fast path to avoid pfmemalloc checks Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/17] mm: Introduce __GFP_MEMALLOC to allow access to emergency reserves Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/17] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/17] mm: Only set page->pfmemalloc when ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS was used Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/17] mm: Ignore mempolicies when using ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/17] net: Introduce sk_gfp_atomic() to allow addition of GFP flags depending on the individual socket Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 20:10   ` David Miller
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/17] netvm: Allow the use of __GFP_MEMALLOC by specific sockets Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 20:11   ` David Miller
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 20:12   ` David Miller
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/17] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 20:12   ` David Miller
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 12/17] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc from skb_alloc_page " Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 20:13   ` David Miller
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 13/17] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 20:13   ` David Miller
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 14/17] mm: Micro-optimise slab to avoid a function call Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 15/17] nbd: Set SOCK_MEMALLOC for access to PFMEMALLOC reserves Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 16/17] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 17/17] mm: Account for the number of times direct reclaimers get throttled Mel Gorman
2012-05-18  1:11 ` [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V11 Eric B Munson
2012-05-18  1:46 ` Eric B Munson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120620073805.GD8810@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).