From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux-Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:54:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120622105451.GC8271@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120621163029.GB6045@breakpoint.cc>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 06:30:29PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index 1d6ecc8..9a58dcc 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -167,14 +206,19 @@ static void skb_under_panic(struct sk_buff *skb, int sz, void *here)
> > * %GFP_ATOMIC.
> > */
> > struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > - int fclone, int node)
> > + int flags, int node)
> > {
> > struct kmem_cache *cache;
> > struct skb_shared_info *shinfo;
> > struct sk_buff *skb;
> > u8 *data;
> > + bool pfmemalloc;
> >
> > - cache = fclone ? skbuff_fclone_cache : skbuff_head_cache;
> > + cache = (flags & SKB_ALLOC_FCLONE)
> > + ? skbuff_fclone_cache : skbuff_head_cache;
> > +
> > + if (sk_memalloc_socks() && (flags & SKB_ALLOC_RX))
> > + gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
> >
> > /* Get the HEAD */
> > skb = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cache, gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DMA, node);
>
> This is mostly used by nic to refil their RX skb pool. You add the
> __GFP_MEMALLOC to the allocation to rise the change of a successfull refill
> for the swap case.
> A few drivers use build_skb() to create the skb. __netdev_alloc_skb()
> shouldn't be affected since the allocation happens with GFP_ATOMIC. Looking at
> TG3 it uses build_skb() and get_pages() / kmalloc(). Shouldn't this be some
> considered?
>
While TG3 is not exactly as you describe after rebasing build_skb should
make a similar check to __alloc_skb. As it is always used for RX allocation
from the skbuff_head_cache cache the following should be suitable. Thanks.
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 9832001..063830c 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -310,8 +310,12 @@ struct sk_buff *build_skb(void *data, unsigned int frag_size)
struct skb_shared_info *shinfo;
struct sk_buff *skb;
unsigned int size = frag_size ? : ksize(data);
+ gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_ATOMIC;
- skb = kmem_cache_alloc(skbuff_head_cache, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (sk_memalloc_socks())
+ gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
+
+ skb = kmem_cache_alloc(skbuff_head_cache, gfp_mask);
if (!skb)
return NULL;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-22 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 11:43 [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V12 (resend) Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm: sl[au]b: Add knowledge of PFMEMALLOC reserve pages Mel Gorman
2012-06-21 21:30 ` Rik van Riel
2012-06-22 9:34 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm: slub: Optimise the SLUB fast path to avoid pfmemalloc checks Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 03/17] mm: Introduce __GFP_MEMALLOC to allow access to emergency reserves Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 04/17] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 05/17] mm: Only set page->pfmemalloc when ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS was used Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 06/17] mm: Ignore mempolicies when using ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 07/17] net: Introduce sk_gfp_atomic() to allow addition of GFP flags depending on the individual socket Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 12:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-20 14:20 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 08/17] net: Do not coalesce skbs belonging to PFMEMALLOC sockets Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 12:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-20 13:36 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 13:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-20 14:18 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 09/17] netvm: Allow the use of __GFP_MEMALLOC by specific sockets Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves Mel Gorman
2012-06-21 16:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-06-22 10:00 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-21 16:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-06-21 16:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-21 16:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-06-22 10:54 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-06-22 11:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 11/17] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 12/17] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc from skb_alloc_page " Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 13/17] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 14/17] mm: Micro-optimise slab to avoid a function call Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 15/17] nbd: Set SOCK_MEMALLOC for access to PFMEMALLOC reserves Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 16/17] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 11:44 ` [PATCH 17/17] mm: Account for the number of times direct reclaimers get throttled Mel Gorman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-17 14:50 [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V11 Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves Mel Gorman
2012-05-17 20:12 ` David Miller
2012-05-10 13:44 [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V10 Mel Gorman
2012-05-10 13:45 ` [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves Mel Gorman
2012-05-11 4:57 ` David Miller
2012-05-11 14:32 ` Mel Gorman
2012-05-11 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-11 15:07 ` Mel Gorman
2012-05-11 21:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120622105451.GC8271@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).