From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
devel@openvz.org, Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix bad behavior in use_hierarchy file
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:49:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120625204908.GL3869@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340616061-1955-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:21:01PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> I have an application that does the following:
>
> * copy the state of all controllers attached to a hierarchy
> * replicate it as a child of the current level.
>
> I would expect writes to the files to mostly succeed, since they
> are inheriting sane values from parents.
>
> But that is not the case for use_hierarchy. If it is set to 0, we
> succeed ok. If we're set to 1, the value of the file is automatically
> set to 1 in the children, but if userspace tries to write the
> very same 1, it will fail. That same situation happens if we
> set use_hierarchy, create a child, and then try to write 1 again.
>
> Now, there is no reason whatsoever for failing to write a value
> that is already there. It doesn't even match the comments, that
> states:
>
> /* If parent's use_hierarchy is set, we can't make any modifications
> * in the child subtrees...
>
> since we are not changing anything.
>
> The following patch tests the new value against the one we're storing,
> and automatically return 0 if we're not proposing a change.
A bit of delta but is there any chance we can either deprecate
.use_hierarhcy or at least make it global toggle instead of subtree
thing? This seems needlessly complicated. :(
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 9:21 [PATCH] fix bad behavior in use_hierarchy file Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 9:54 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-25 12:08 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-25 12:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 12:49 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-25 12:55 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 13:22 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-25 20:49 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-06-25 22:26 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 7:56 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 10:31 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 11:10 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 11:12 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 17:55 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-23 17:22 ` Ying Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120625204908.GL3869@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).