From: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/sparse: optimize sparse_index_alloc
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:07:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120626060735.GA9483@shangw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120625153035.GB19810@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
>> With CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME, the two level of memory section
>> descriptors are allocated from slab or bootmem. When allocating
>> from slab, let slab allocator to clear the memory chunk. However,
>> the memory chunk from bootmem allocator, we have to clear that
>> explicitly.
>
>I am sorry but I do not see how this optimize the current code. What is
>the difference between slab doing memset and doing it explicitly for all
>cases?
>
Yeah, I do agree it won't do much optimization here. However, I'm wandering
if I can remove the whole peice of code doing memset(setion, 0, array_size)
since it seems that alloc_bootmem_node() also clears the allocated memory
chunk :-)
Please correct me if I'm wrong about alloc_bootmem_node() :-)
Thanks,
Gavin
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> mm/sparse.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>> index afd0998..ce50c8b 100644
>> --- a/mm/sparse.c
>> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
>> @@ -74,14 +74,14 @@ static struct mem_section noinline __init_refok *sparse_index_alloc(int nid)
>>
>> if (slab_is_available()) {
>> if (node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
>> - section = kmalloc_node(array_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
>> + section = kzalloc_node(array_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
>> else
>> - section = kmalloc(array_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> - } else
>> + section = kzalloc(array_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + } else {
>> section = alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(nid), array_size);
>> -
>> - if (section)
>> - memset(section, 0, array_size);
>> + if (section)
>> + memset(section, 0, array_size);
>> + }
>>
>> return section;
>> }
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
>--
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs
>SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
>Lihovarska 1060/12
>190 00 Praha 9
>Czech Republic
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
>see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-26 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-23 15:52 [PATCH 1/5] mm/sparse: check size of struct mm_section Gavin Shan
2012-06-23 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/sparse: optimize sparse_index_alloc Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:30 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 6:07 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2012-06-26 7:04 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 7:13 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-23 15:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/sparse: fix possible memory leak Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:48 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 6:11 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 7:14 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 7:17 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-23 15:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/sparse: more check on mem_section number Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 16:15 ` Dave Hansen
2012-06-27 0:29 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-23 15:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/sparse: return 0 if root mem_section exists Gavin Shan
2012-06-24 19:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-25 1:09 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:39 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-25 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/sparse: check size of struct mm_section Michal Hocko
2012-06-25 16:35 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 7:39 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 7:48 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 8:06 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 8:24 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 17:57 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-27 3:01 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120626060735.GA9483@shangw \
--to=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).