From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/sparse: optimize sparse_index_alloc
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:04:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120626070421.GA6713@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120626060735.GA9483@shangw>
On Tue 26-06-12 14:07:35, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> With CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME, the two level of memory section
> >> descriptors are allocated from slab or bootmem. When allocating
> >> from slab, let slab allocator to clear the memory chunk. However,
> >> the memory chunk from bootmem allocator, we have to clear that
> >> explicitly.
> >
> >I am sorry but I do not see how this optimize the current code. What is
> >the difference between slab doing memset and doing it explicitly for all
> >cases?
> >
>
> Yeah, I do agree it won't do much optimization here. However, I'm wandering
> if I can remove the whole peice of code doing memset(setion, 0, array_size)
> since it seems that alloc_bootmem_node() also clears the allocated memory
> chunk :-)
Yes, alloc_bootem_node clears the memory (strange, I thought it doesn't
do that), so the memset is really not necessary after s/kmalloc/kzalloc/.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong about alloc_bootmem_node() :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> mm/sparse.c | 12 ++++++------
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> >> index afd0998..ce50c8b 100644
> >> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> >> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> >> @@ -74,14 +74,14 @@ static struct mem_section noinline __init_refok *sparse_index_alloc(int nid)
> >>
> >> if (slab_is_available()) {
> >> if (node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
> >> - section = kmalloc_node(array_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> >> + section = kzalloc_node(array_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> >> else
> >> - section = kmalloc(array_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> - } else
> >> + section = kzalloc(array_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + } else {
> >> section = alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(nid), array_size);
> >> -
> >> - if (section)
> >> - memset(section, 0, array_size);
> >> + if (section)
> >> + memset(section, 0, array_size);
> >> + }
> >>
> >> return section;
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 1.7.9.5
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> >> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> >> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> >> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> >
> >--
> >Michal Hocko
> >SUSE Labs
> >SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
> >Lihovarska 1060/12
> >190 00 Praha 9
> >Czech Republic
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> >the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> >see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> >Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> >
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-26 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-23 15:52 [PATCH 1/5] mm/sparse: check size of struct mm_section Gavin Shan
2012-06-23 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/sparse: optimize sparse_index_alloc Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:30 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 6:07 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 7:04 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2012-06-26 7:13 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-23 15:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/sparse: fix possible memory leak Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:48 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 6:11 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 7:14 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 7:17 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-23 15:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/sparse: more check on mem_section number Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 16:15 ` Dave Hansen
2012-06-27 0:29 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-23 15:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/sparse: return 0 if root mem_section exists Gavin Shan
2012-06-24 19:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-25 1:09 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:39 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-25 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/sparse: check size of struct mm_section Michal Hocko
2012-06-25 16:35 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 7:39 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 7:48 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 8:06 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-26 8:24 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-26 17:57 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-27 3:01 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120626070421.GA6713@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).