From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KSM: numa awareness sysfs knob
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:17:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120629141759.3312b49e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340970592-25001-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com>
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:49:52 +0200
Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com> wrote:
> Introduces new sysfs boolean knob /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/merge_nodes
> which control merging pages across different numa nodes.
> When it is set to zero only pages from the same node are merged,
> otherwise pages from all nodes can be merged together (default behavior).
>
> Typical use-case could be a lot of KVM guests on NUMA machine
> and cpus from more distant nodes would have significant increase
> of access latency to the merged ksm page. Sysfs knob was choosen
> for higher scalability.
>
> Every numa node has its own stable & unstable trees because
> of faster searching and inserting. Changing of merge_nodes
> value is possible only when there are not any ksm shared pages in system.
It would be neat to have a knob which enables KSM for all anon
mappings. ie: pretend that MADV_MERGEABLE is always set. For testing
coverage purposes.
> I've tested this patch on numa machines with 2, 4 and 8 nodes and
> measured speed of memory access inside of KVM guests with memory pinned
> to one of nodes with this benchmark:
>
> http://pholasek.fedorapeople.org/alloc_pg.c
>
> Population standard deviations of access times in percentage of average
> were following:
>
> merge_nodes=1
> 2 nodes 1.4%
> 4 nodes 1.6%
> 8 nodes 1.7%
>
> merge_nodes=0
> 2 nodes 1%
> 4 nodes 0.32%
> 8 nodes 0.018%
ooh, numbers! Thanks.
> --- a/Documentation/vm/ksm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/vm/ksm.txt
> @@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ sleep_millisecs - how many milliseconds ksmd should sleep before next scan
> e.g. "echo 20 > /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/sleep_millisecs"
> Default: 20 (chosen for demonstration purposes)
>
> +merge_nodes - specifies if pages from different numa nodes can be merged.
> + When set to 0, ksm merges only pages which physically
> + resides in the memory area of same NUMA node. It brings
> + lower latency to access to shared page.
> + Default: 1
s/resides/reside/.
This doc should mention that /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run should be zeroed to
alter merge_nodes. Otherwise confusion will reign.
>
> ...
>
> +static ssize_t merge_nodes_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + int err;
> + unsigned long knob;
> +
> + err = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &knob);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + if (knob > 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (ksm_run & KSM_RUN_MERGE)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ksm_thread_mutex);
> + if (ksm_merge_nodes != knob) {
> + if (ksm_pages_shared > 0)
> + return -EBUSY;
> + else
> + ksm_merge_nodes = knob;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&ksm_thread_mutex);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
Seems a bit racy. Shouldn't the test of ksm_run be inside the locked
region?
> +KSM_ATTR(merge_nodes);
> +#endif
>
> ...
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-29 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-29 11:49 [PATCH v2] KSM: numa awareness sysfs knob Petr Holasek
2012-06-29 13:03 ` Cong Wang
2012-06-29 13:23 ` Petr Holasek
2012-06-29 16:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-06-29 16:30 ` Petr Holasek
2012-06-29 16:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-06-29 22:30 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-30 11:40 ` Petr Holasek
2012-07-02 21:26 ` David Rientjes
2012-07-03 17:02 ` Petr Holasek
2012-06-29 21:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-06-29 22:50 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-30 9:43 ` Izik Eidus
2012-06-30 12:29 ` Petr Holasek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120629141759.3312b49e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pholasek@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).