From: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KSM: numa awareness sysfs knob
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:30:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120629163033.GA11327@stainedmachine.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120629160510.GA10082@cmpxchg.org>
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Petr Holasek wrote:
> > Introduces new sysfs boolean knob /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/merge_nodes
> > which control merging pages across different numa nodes.
> > When it is set to zero only pages from the same node are merged,
> > otherwise pages from all nodes can be merged together (default behavior).
>
> Is it conceivable that admins may (in the future) want to merge only
> across nodes that are below a given distance threshold?
>
> I'm not asking to implement this, just whether the knob can be
> introduced such that it's future-compatible. Make it default to a
> Very High Number and only allow setting it to 0 for now e.g.? And
> name it max_node_merge_distance (I'm bad at names)?
>
> What do you think?
I started with exactly same idea as you described above in the first
RFC, link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/30/91
But this approach turned out to be more complicated than it looked
(see two last emails in thread) and complexity of solution would rise
a lot.
Regards,
Petr H
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-29 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-29 11:49 [PATCH v2] KSM: numa awareness sysfs knob Petr Holasek
2012-06-29 13:03 ` Cong Wang
2012-06-29 13:23 ` Petr Holasek
2012-06-29 16:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-06-29 16:30 ` Petr Holasek [this message]
2012-06-29 16:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-06-29 22:30 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-30 11:40 ` Petr Holasek
2012-07-02 21:26 ` David Rientjes
2012-07-03 17:02 ` Petr Holasek
2012-06-29 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-29 22:50 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-30 9:43 ` Izik Eidus
2012-06-30 12:29 ` Petr Holasek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120629163033.GA11327@stainedmachine.redhat.com \
--to=pholasek@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).