From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx164.postini.com [74.125.245.164]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17B546B005D for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:13:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:13:43 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -mm] memcg: prevent from OOM with too many dirty pages Message-Id: <20120712141343.e1cb7776.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120712070501.GB21013@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <1340117404-30348-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <20120619150014.1ebc108c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120620101119.GC5541@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20120712070501.GB21013@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: Hugh Dickins , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , Rik van Riel , Ying Han , Greg Thelen , Johannes Weiner , Fengguang Wu On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:05:01 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote: > When we are back to the patch. Is it going into 3.5? I hope so and I > think it is really worth stable as well. Andrew? What patch. "memcg: prevent OOM with too many dirty pages"? I wasn't planning on 3.5, given the way it's been churning around. How about we put it into 3.6 and tag it for a -stable backport, so it gets a bit of a run in mainline before we inflict it upon -stable users? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org