From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
aaditya.kumar.30@gmail.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + memory-hotplug-fix-kswapd-looping-forever-problem-fix-fix.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:15:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120720171546.GG32763@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120719235057.GA21012@bbox>
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:50:57AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > But, really, given how the structure is used, I think we're better off
> > just making sure all archs clear them and maybe have a sanity check or
> > two just in case. It's not like breakage on that front is gonna be
> > subtle.
>
> Of course, it seems all archs seems to zero-out already as I mentioned
> (Not sure, MIPS) but Andrew doesn't want it. Andrew?
So, to be more direct. Either 1. remove the spurious initializations
(and hunt down archs which don't zero them if there's any) or 2. leave
it alone. It's one of the data structures which are allocated and
used way before any generic code kicks in. I mean, even how it's
deferenced is arch-dependent - it's wrapped in NODE_DATA macro for a
reason.
I would vote for #1 as it's simply brain-damaged to not zero any
global data structure and partial initialization of a data structure
already in use is silly and dangerous.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-20 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120717233115.A8E411E005C@wpzn4.hot.corp.google.com>
2012-07-18 1:22 ` + memory-hotplug-fix-kswapd-looping-forever-problem-fix-fix.patch added to -mm tree Minchan Kim
2012-07-18 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-19 0:10 ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-19 0:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-19 0:48 ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-19 16:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-19 23:50 ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-20 17:15 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-07-20 21:22 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-20 21:36 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-23 4:58 ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-23 15:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-24 1:11 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120720171546.GG32763@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=aaditya.kumar.30@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).