From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx146.postini.com [74.125.245.146]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D52576B004D for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:46:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so2049592pbb.14 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:45:56 -0700 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable Message-ID: <20120801224556.GF15477@google.com> References: <1343757920-19713-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <1343757920-19713-2-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <20120731182330.GD21292@google.com> <50197348.9010101@gmail.com> <20120801182112.GC15477@google.com> <50197460.8010906@gmail.com> <20120801182749.GD15477@google.com> <50197E4A.7020408@gmail.com> <20120801202432.GE15477@google.com> <5019B0B4.1090102@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5019B0B4.1090102@gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Sasha Levin Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 12:41:56AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > How would your DEFINE_HASHTABLE look like if we got for the simple > 'struct hash_table' approach? I think defining a different enclosing anonymous struct which the requested number of array entries and then aliasing the actual hash_table to that symbol should work. It's rather horrible and I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org