From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:15:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120802161556.GA25572@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501A7AD3.7000008@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:04:19PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 01:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> #define DEFINE_HASH_TABLE(name, length) struct hash_table name = { .count = length, .buckets = { [0 ... (length - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
> > The limitation of this approach is that the struct hash_table variable must be 'static', which is a bit limiting - see for example the use of hashtable in 'struct user_namespace'.
> >
>
> What if we just use two possible decelerations? One of static structs and one for regular ones.
>
> struct hash_table {
> size_t bits;
> struct hlist_head buckets[];
> };
>
> #define DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) \
> union { \
> struct hash_table name; \
> struct { \
> size_t bits; \
This shouldn't use "bits", since it'll get expanded to the macro
argument.
> struct hlist_head buckets[1 << bits]; \
> } __name; \
__##name
> }
>
> #define DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(name, bit) \
> static struct hash_table name = { .bits = bit, \
> .buckets = { [0 ... (bit - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
You probably wanted to change that to [0 ... ((1 << bit) - 1)] , to
match DEFINE_HASHTABLE.
Since your definition of DEFINE_HASHTABLE would also work fine when used
statically, why not just always use that?
#define DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(name, bits) static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) = { .name.bits = bits }
One downside: you can't use this to define a global non-static hash
table, because you can't have a global non-static anonymous union.
Using the non-union form would actually allow a global non-static hash
table:
#define DEFINE_HASHTABLE_INIT(name, bits) struct hash_table name = { .bits = bits, .buckets = { [0 ... ((1 << bits) - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
/* elsewhere */
extern struct hash_table name;
I don't know if that seems like a good idea or not.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-02 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-31 18:05 [RFC 0/4] generic hashtable implementation Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-31 20:31 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:19 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 18:24 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 19:06 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 20:24 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 22:41 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 22:45 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-02 10:00 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 10:32 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 11:23 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 13:04 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 16:15 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-08-02 16:48 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 17:44 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 17:54 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 20:41 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 21:47 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-03 17:59 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 16:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-02 16:34 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 16:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-02 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 17:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-02 17:59 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 20:25 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 21:21 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 9:35 ` Josh Triplett
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 2/4] user_ns: use new hashtable implementation Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 3/4] mm,ksm: " Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 4/4] workqueue: " Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120802161556.GA25572@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).