linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:15:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120802161556.GA25572@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501A7AD3.7000008@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:04:19PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 01:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> #define DEFINE_HASH_TABLE(name, length) struct hash_table name = { .count = length, .buckets = { [0 ... (length - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
> > The limitation of this approach is that the struct hash_table variable must be 'static', which is a bit limiting - see for example the use of hashtable in 'struct user_namespace'.
> > 
> 
> What if we just use two possible decelerations? One of static structs and one for regular ones.
> 
> struct hash_table {
>         size_t bits;
>         struct hlist_head buckets[];
> };
> 
> #define DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits)                                    \
>         union {                                                         \
>                 struct hash_table name;                                 \
>                 struct {                                                \
>                         size_t bits;                                    \

This shouldn't use "bits", since it'll get expanded to the macro
argument.

>                         struct hlist_head buckets[1 << bits];           \
>                 } __name;                                               \

__##name

>         }
> 
> #define DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(name, bit)                              \
>         static struct hash_table name = { .bits = bit,                  \
>                 .buckets = { [0 ... (bit - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }

You probably wanted to change that to [0 ... ((1 << bit) - 1)] , to
match DEFINE_HASHTABLE.

Since your definition of DEFINE_HASHTABLE would also work fine when used
statically, why not just always use that?

#define DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(name, bits) static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) = { .name.bits = bits }

One downside: you can't use this to define a global non-static hash
table, because you can't have a global non-static anonymous union.
Using the non-union form would actually allow a global non-static hash
table:

#define DEFINE_HASHTABLE_INIT(name, bits) struct hash_table name = { .bits = bits, .buckets = { [0 ... ((1 << bits) - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }

/* elsewhere */
extern struct hash_table name;

I don't know if that seems like a good idea or not.

- Josh Triplett

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-02 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-31 18:05 [RFC 0/4] generic hashtable implementation Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:23   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-31 20:31     ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:19     ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:21       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 18:24         ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:27           ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 19:06             ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 20:24               ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 22:41                 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 22:45                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-02 10:00                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 10:32                       ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 11:23                         ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 13:04                           ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 16:15                             ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-08-02 16:48                               ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 17:44                                 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 17:54                                   ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 20:41                                     ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 21:47                                       ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-03 17:59                                         ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 16:03                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-02 16:34                             ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 16:40                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-02 17:32                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 17:48                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-02 17:59                                   ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 18:08                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 20:25                                       ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 20:32                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 21:21                                           ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 21:50                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02  9:35             ` Josh Triplett
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 2/4] user_ns: use new hashtable implementation Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 3/4] mm,ksm: " Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 4/4] workqueue: " Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120802161556.GA25572@leaf \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).